Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: The Philosopher who wrote (78193)	10/22/2003 5:09:02 PM
From: one_less	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 82486

"I'm not surprised that Jewel wants to duck the question." And I am not surprised that you continue to dishonor your self and humanity with nearly every post.

To: The Philosopher who wrote (78193)	10/22/2003 5:39:27 PM
From: Lane3	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 82486

I see you're getting no more response than I did. If you deny that resources are limited, you can't answer the question because it would be meaningless. Looks like that's his take on it. And that those who do think resources are limited are, what was it, materialistic utilitarians. I think I'd rather live in a system of materialistic utilitarianism than socialism, which is what you get if just keep taking from each according to their ability to give to those who need. Didn't we prove in the last century that that doesn't work over the long haul?