Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Precious and Base Metal Investing -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Michael Bidder who wrote (22770)	10/24/2003 12:39:25 AM
From: Michael Bidder	Respond to of 39344

Then again what hand could they have against malicious intent?

To: Michael Bidder who wrote (22770)	10/25/2003 10:47:45 AM
From: Little Joe	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 39344

Michael: I'm sorry but the plain fact is that AQI has done nothing that is actionable. They acted prudently and the threatened law suit is absurd. Little joe

To: Michael Bidder who wrote (22770)	10/26/2003 8:44:04 AM
From: TheBusDriver	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 39344

You better be right Mike because if you are as deep in IMA as you claim and this goes aganist them you will be in serious trouble. Hence the emotion I suspect. And the stories the little birds are telling you? What, are they sitting on the phone lines? First hand knowledge is all that counts here not little bird stories..... As LJ has pointed AQI has done nothing wrong and the saber rattling is being done by IMA. This could work aganist them in the end. I'm waiting for the dust to settle now and see what comes of all this. Everyone should just keep their cool..... Wayne