SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Bilow who wrote (117618)10/24/2003 6:12:31 PM
From: stockman_scott  Respond to of 281500
 
The Spy Who Was Thrown Into the Cold

truthout.org



To: Bilow who wrote (117618)10/24/2003 7:10:49 PM
From: Sidney Reilly  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 281500
 
The problem with saying there is success in the war on terror is that there is no baseline for comparison. There is no way of knowing whether or not just doing the same as we had been would have produced the same results or not, ie. no attacks on the USA. It's not like we were inundated with terrorist attacks for years before 9-11 and now they have been stopped. There were no terror attacks on US soil before 9-11. We're not safer than we were before! Bush is being very disingenuous when he says we are winning the war on terror. Who can say that the billions spent in the war on terror, the development of the new gestapo, oops, I mean the Dept of Homeland Security and other changes has had any effect at all on the level of terror directed at the USA? It is only an article of faith that anyone chooses to believe that Al Qaeda was responsible for 9-11 considering there is no evidence they did it.So who's to say Bush bankrupting the USA has had any beneficial results in "the war on [fake] terror".



To: Bilow who wrote (117618)10/24/2003 8:46:20 PM
From: skinowski  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 281500
 
the war on Terror is going so well that Rumsfeld is bored. Instead of working on an already solved problem, he whiles away the day with speculation.

But isn't it interesting how the Guardian's of the world can spin a memo full of speculation and fairly constructive questions into an "admission" of "doubts" - and of not knowing whether we are winning or losing the war?

I would guess that the leak was deliberate, btw...



To: Bilow who wrote (117618)10/25/2003 8:17:09 PM
From: stockman_scott  Respond to of 281500
 
<<...That tortured chapter of American history marked "Iraq" will not rest. The Bush administration insists that the threat to the United States was so serious and so urgent that invasion was unavoidable. But the public remains unconvinced...>>

csmonitor.com