Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Precious and Base Metal Investing -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: jrhana who wrote (22863)	10/25/2003 12:36:12 PM
From: ralfph	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 39344

jrhana - You are assuming that the letter was confidential and private. There is no such thing. Once that letter reached IMRs hands they had to disclose the contents to other parties involved in the financing. After this point IMR was no longer in control of the imformation flow and they had to imform the public as to why the financing fell through. I have been on the recieving end of one of private and confidential letters . The person who sent the letter tried to take the same stand. ( That it was private )Even after the contents of the letter were prooved false the stand that was taken was that the contents of the letter were not pertinant because they were private. It was not until this guy was in the position of losing his job and house that the matter was settled. Bottom line after a lot of personal grief I won. Some forensic auditing and a arbitrator could clean this matter up quite quickly. take care ralfph AQI could be 100% in the right. But I dumped my shares anyway for the simple reason I felt that the share price had more down side than up.