Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: MSI who wrote (481715)	10/26/2003 2:42:05 PM
From: DavesM	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769667

Now that you mention Wellstone, do you think it bothered the Senator, that his State's largest city, is one of the most segregated cities in the United States (has one of the worst disparities of household incomes between black and white households as well)?

To: MSI who wrote (481715)	10/26/2003 3:17:52 PM
From: American Spirit	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769667

Liberals are not going to beat Bush by themselves. That lesson has been learned time and time again. If you want to beat Bush, take away his military issues by running one or two more moderate war heros against him. Then he's toast. Liberals account for something like 30% of the voters, and they are clustered mostly in specific states which are the easiest states for Dems to win. You cant win swing states by pushing an anti-war liberal position. Bush's weakness on the Iraq War is really about piss-poor planning, unilateralism, dishonesty and arrogance, not Saddam or the war itself. If you run against the war as a whole as Dean is doing, you cannot beat Bush in the general election. Despite all his flaws, Bush projects strength. Strength versus strength is what's needed. Liberals have a very hard time convincing anyone they're strong on defense, or are masculine men. On a primal level, it's about who's the strongest chief on the battlefield.