SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Raymond Duray who wrote (484316)10/31/2003 6:58:17 AM
From: Peter O'Brien  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 769670
 
If the government is so untrustworthy...

why do liberals want to RAISE taxes?

It is an inconsistent position.



To: Raymond Duray who wrote (484316)10/31/2003 8:50:47 AM
From: PROLIFE  Respond to of 769670
 
He is on America's side...unlike some here, you know who you are...



To: Raymond Duray who wrote (484316)10/31/2003 11:01:49 PM
From: Dan B.  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 769670
 
That article poses questions concerning who was right and who was wrong, but it does not show we were wrong to take out Saddam. By definition, questions of right and wrong do not lies make, and you and your article only appear to purport that such DOES define a lie. If there are no WMD's(well, it seems there were(known to all from the past), Saddam was preserving what he had and working on prohibited projects. Where are those biological agents, anyway?) ready to go in Iraq it means we got there in time(however unlikely this may be in reality considering his known efforts and the time he had to obfuscate and hide/disperse(another known quality of Saddam))).

Having enjoyed the above sentence, I'm sure you'll enjoy countering the fact that Saddam is what you pretend at times to admit him to be(not that you recognize any just consequences which have now resulted from the truth of it), namely, a character so terrible that he ought not be trusted with our safety at stake.

Dan B.