SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: LindyBill who wrote (14878)11/2/2003 9:05:01 AM
From: John Carragher  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 793731
 
A lot of things could have been different after war in Iraq.. then we are still at war and in battle you adjust..

Not being there it is hard to say why they didn't want to keep Iraq Army together other than many of the leaders were loyal to Saddam and it may have been a situation of not being able to tell who was who.. Perhaps things could have been a lot worse if they kept the Army together?



To: LindyBill who wrote (14878)11/2/2003 9:08:20 AM
From: KyrosL  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 793731
 
The best long term scenario for the Democrats is for Bush to win a second term. The frantic attempts to reflate the bubble will backfire terribly, IMO, after 2004, and the Democrats will return in triumph in 2008, probably with Hillary at the helm.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News