SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: lifeisgood who wrote (118302)11/2/2003 12:15:13 PM
From: skinowski  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 281500
 
LIG, with all respect, I think that "complacency" in this case would be to turn the other cheek. I think that the main reason that Al Qaeda did not perpetrate further attacks is that they would not serve their purpose. As it is, the American public opinion is split - and the Administration may have to pay - rightly or wrongly - a heavy price for the war in Iraq.

A major attack against the US would solidify support for the fight against Islamic radicals. They will attack us, unfortunately, sooner or later - when they'll think it will serve their interest.

Our enemies are crazy, but by no means stupid. One must assume that their madness has a system - and a direction.



To: lifeisgood who wrote (118302)11/2/2003 12:15:47 PM
From: jerry manning  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 281500
 
He never said they ALL left the US.

Why do you insinuate he meant that they had all gone to Iraq? Just being sloppy or spinning it your way?

Of course some of the fanatics are still here.