Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: JF Quinnelly who wrote (15205)	11/5/2003 12:56:09 AM
From: LindyBill	Read Replies (5) \| Respond to of 793715

And you base this assertion on what, exactly? On the fact that Artillery has the best in the world right now. The M109A6 Paladin Self Propelled Howitzer. army-technology.com This will handle all needs for a long time, and is constantly being upgraded. The Crusader was a "price of their toys" weapon that is not needed. Here is a summary of the argument. _________________________________ US Pentagon Panel Recommends Canceling New Artillery System An advisory panel appointed by US Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld has called for the cancellation of the Army's new mobile artillery system, the Crusader, along with other weapons programs designed for large- scale wars, The New York Times reported Monday. The recommendations, outlined in a briefing for Rumsfeld last Saturday, conclude that the Crusader is ill-suited for a new military strategy focused on projecting military power over long distances with air and naval forces, The Times said. The U.S. Army plans to spend 11.1 billion U.S. dollars to build 480 Crusaders, which are automatic, self-propelled 155-millimeter howitzers, or cannons, enabling them to fire farther and faster than the Army's existing artillery system, known as the Paladin. They are cumbersome at a time when the Army's chief of staff, General Eric Shinseki, has proposed lighter, more agile fighting forces, the newspaper said. The Crusader reflects the debate over the weapons the United States will need in battles that are not expected to reflect Cold War-era strategies. The recommendations also are expected to become a test of the Bush administration's promises to reshape the military for the 21st century, pitting supporters of overhauls against supporters of service traditions, defense contractors and jobs, the Times said. President George W. Bush has pledged to abandon programs that make marginal improvements in existing weapons. But the Crusader has powerful supporters in the Army and on Capitol Hill, making any cuts difficult. The panel also recommended scrapping plans to modernize other Army weapons, including the M1-A2 Abrams tank, the Bradley armored combat vehicle and the Air Force's B-1 bomber. fpeng.peopledaily.com.cn