Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Oeconomicus who wrote (159543)	11/5/2003 1:52:33 PM
From: Lizzie Tudor	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 164684

You want to blame Bush for that and let the party of special interests off the hook? I want to blame Bush for the fact that we went from a budget surplus to the largest deficit ever in less than 3 years, that is all. I want to blame Bush for spending almost 500 billion in 3 years, a feat not many would have thought possible 5 years ago. As far as blaming congress, we have a republican controlled congress as you know. I have to say, listening to republicans defend Bush's fiscal mismanagement is really bizarre. If a democrat had spent to this degree, republicans would be screaming bloody murder, I think we all know that. Somehow because the money went to a different set of people (vs. who the dems would have given it to) somehow gets defended by republicans. If Arnold mismanages California to the degree that Bush has mismanaged the US, the voters will drop him like a rock. Bush is the national version of Davis, I don't know why you defend him.