Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : SI vs. iHub - Battle of the Boards Part 2 -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: SI Bob who wrote (5208)	11/6/2003 6:59:39 PM
From: David Lawrence	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 5315

It is self-imposed: #reply-19355908 It's too bad Breen flapped his jaws, particularly if he had nothing to back up the claim. If the jury is made aware of his 9/11 brain fart, his burden of proof goes way up. I suspect he had a good case, otherwise. It would be very cool if Court-TV picked it up, but I doubt it since there is no blood 'n gore.

To: SI Bob who wrote (5208)	11/7/2003 1:39:46 PM
From: Edscharp	Respond to of 5315

I agree that the DA was stupid to bring up the 911 connection, but that doesn't change the quality of the evidence acquired by the Feds. Either they've got the goods or they don't. The brainless grandstanding of one moron shouldn't alter the outcome, one way or the other. If you really miss the nasty posts I'd be glad to fill in for a while, but I don't feel I should be suspended for it. lol. If you really want to create some excitement I suggest suspending Truthseeker for posting boring drivel. My G-d, he's non-stop and he posts every single day. The man needs a vacation. lol