Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (118861)	11/7/2003 2:06:17 AM
From: jttmab	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

You miscontrued my saying that Saddam was a threat into meaning that he was a coventional military threat Let me quote the passage in question.... from post 118837 That's about as successful a policy of containment as one can have. [jttmab] The army wasn't in shambles ....[Nadine] If you weren't talking about conventional military in the context of a policy of containment ....why would you say "The army wasn't in shambles..." I don't think there is any reasonable person that could possibly interpret "army" as non-conventional weaponry. You need to get your story straight. I'm tired and it's obvious that you can't keep your story straight. jttmab