Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Just the Facts, Ma'am: A Compendium of Liberal Fiction -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: American Spirit who wrote (910)	11/11/2003 12:07:58 PM
From: mph	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 90947

I suggest you take your own advice. I don't put credence in folks of the Palast persuasion. and, btw, I was referring to your assumption that every one of the allegedly "scrubbed" votes was improperly removed, that, even if each person had remained eligible, that he or she would have voted, and that if he or she had voted, that the vote would have gone to Gore. And that assumes that the voter was not too stupid to understand the butterfly ballot or to ensure the lack of hanging chads.

To: American Spirit who wrote (910)	11/11/2003 1:15:38 PM
From: Original Mad Dog	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 90947

The Palast stuff about the 57,000 "scrubbed" voters was already refuted a couple of weeks ago. It is based on an article Palast links: gregpalast.com Which contains obvious and glaring factual inaccuracies and outright lies: Message 19453208 See the linked post for the details. The 57,000 unfairly scrubbed voter story is demonstrably false.