SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Clown-Free Zone... sorry, no clowns allowed -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Terry Maloney who wrote (267502)11/16/2003 10:42:08 PM
From: Pogeu Mahone  Respond to of 436258
 
November 17, 2003
Over Baghdad: Wary Targets, Yet Confident
By DEXTER FILKINS

AGHDAD, Iraq, Nov. 16 — As the rooftops of the Iraqi capital passed beneath him, the crewman of a Black Hawk helicopter looked down, shook his head and stated what had once again, only the night before, become so tragically clear.

"It's like shooting ducks for them," said Specialist Nik Kayler, 22, over the roar of the rotor. "They could be hiding anywhere down there."

It is not a good time to be a helicopter pilot in the skies over Iraq. In two weeks, the Black Hawks and Chinooks and Apaches that once zoomed overhead with such grace and panache have suddenly become vulnerable. Four American helicopters have been lost over Iraq since Nov. 2, sending 39 soldiers to their deaths.

One copter, a Chinook, was destroyed by a missile fired from a palm grove, and a crowd of Iraqis cheered. Another, a Black Hawk, was brought down by a rocket-propelled grenade.

On Saturday night, in circumstances still unclear, two Black Hawks collided over the northern city of Mosul and plummeted to the ground. Seventeen American soldiers died. American officials said the collision apparently occurred when one of the Black Hawks came under fire and the pilot veered upward, pushing his rotor into the helicopter above.

The collision sent a tremor through the barracks of the Black Hawk pilots and crew at Baghdad's international airport. On Saturday night and Sunday morning, the men gathered to talk about what they might learn from the incident. They brainstormed, as they have done after each downing, for ways to confound an ever more tenacious enemy.

But as the Black Hawks lifted off and landed at their base, the most poignant reckonings were personal. Some of the men here knew those who had died in the collision, and every one of them, whether a friend had perished or not, had only to think of his next mission in the air.

"Deep in my gut, I know the same thing could happen to me," said Lt. Sean Kenney, a Black Hawk pilot, as he prepared to board his craft. "Every night, I see the tracer rounds go up, and I know that one of them one day might hit me."

The pilots who fly the Black Hawks exude steely confidence in themselves, their training and their machines. On any given flight, the odds are in their favor. It is the "lucky shot," as they all call it, that binds their thoughts.

A quick glance at a Black Hawk does indeed inspire a sense of security, or as much of one as is likely in a war zone. At $7 million apiece, the machines are quick and nimble, able to duck and weave with each tilt of the rotor. The pilots sit encased in frames of bulletproof Kevlar. Each Black Hawk has a spare hydraulic system, an extra fuel network and an additional electrical system. The fuel tank, if pierced with a bullet, seals the puncture by itself.

With all of that, the Black Hawk has become the all-purpose aircraft, a kind of flying mule: tough, versatile, able to carry men and matériel almost anywhere, in all kinds of weather, in total darkness. The Black Hawks, with no lights, dart through the night sky invisible; only their sound betrays them.

"It's the best doggone helicopter in the world," said Lt. Col. James Schrote, who commands a fleet of 16 Black Hawks here.

But the vulnerabilities of the Black Hawk, as with any helicopter, are obvious enough. It is far slower than an airplane, so makes for a much easier target. It skims the rooftops, exposing itself to dangers a fighter pilot would never dream of. The Black Hawk helicopter shot down over Tikrit eight days ago was flying just 300 feet off the ground when it was hit with a rocket-propelled grenade. Over Baghdad, Black Hawk pilots coming under fire have sometimes had difficulty turning to get away; they have to watch out for the telephone wires.

The Black Hawk's strengths and vulnerabilities showed themselves in a patrol late Sunday afternoon over the streets of Baghdad. Seen from above, the Iraqi capital is an astonishing sight, its squat buildings stretching for miles in each direction, an ocean of mud bricks broken by the pale green of date palms and the garbage in the streets. It hardly seems the conflicted city it has become.

All of Baghdad is visible this way: the giant green Martyrs Monument to the fallen of the Iran-Iraq war, the buildings destroyed in the current war, laundry flapping on clotheslines, children waving from a football field. The Black Hawk flies so low that it almost seems possible to reach out and touch the people below.

"Strangest thing I've seen is a goat on a rooftop," Chief Warrant Officer Steve Patch said as the Black Hawk raced over the city.

Since arriving in May, the Black Hawk crews working with the First Armored Division have watched the city emerge from the chaos that followed the fall of Saddam Hussein's government. At night, they flew over a city shrouded in darkness; now, with the electricity mostly restored here, it bristles with light.

Colonel Schrote, a veteran of the ill-fated American venture in Somalia 10 years ago, said the city he flies over today has much to recommend it over the Somali capital, Mogadishu, then without a government and broken up by feuding warlords.

"Baghdad is much more civilized than that," he said.

At any point in the hourlong journey on Sunday, one well-placed shot from a rocket-propelled grenade, or a lucky hit from a Kalashnikov rifle, could have sent the Black Hawk and its crew into serious trouble. The shot could come from anywhere: a rooftop, a window, a stairwell.

In some ways, the low altitude preferred by the Black Hawk works in its favor; at treetop level, the helicopter cannot usually be seen until it is directly overhead. Then, in a flash, it has disappeared over the next building. There is very little time to take aim.

On this day, as on most days, the sky above the city stayed calm.

"There used to be parts of the city where we couldn't even fly over," Mr. Patch said.

The evenings are a different matter. Every night, the Black Hawk crews say, the tracer bullets come up to meet them. Flying without lights, racing across the rooftops, the Black Hawks make a difficult target.

"They are shooting at what they hear," Colonel Schrote said.

He figured that more bullets and rocket-propelled grenades had passed by his helicopters than he knew about; in the chaos and darkness, they had gone unseen.

So durable are the Black Hawks that Colonel Schrote said his greatest fear was that his men would be tempted into complacency. Each time they take off in Iraq, he reminds them, they are on a combat mission.

The recent calamities seem a permanent guarantee against anyone here getting too comfortable.

"With the right equipment, with a better aim, they could take down helicopter after helicopter," Specialist Kayler said. "I'm just trying to stay focused."

Copyright 2003 The New York Times Company | Home | Privacy Policy | Search | Corrections | Help | Back to Top



To: Terry Maloney who wrote (267502)11/16/2003 11:46:45 PM
From: GraceZ  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 436258
 
Grace, I don't think everyone's going to be as lucky/determined/intellligent as you ...

Well there is the crux of the issue, you give to the poor because you don't think they are capable of making it on their own. Call it "lucky, smart or determined" but really what you are doing is being condescending to them.

I have another friend who makes the same argument with me all the time. In fact, what is humorous is that she argued this once at dinner, sitting there with my husband who is tenth of ten children and whose father died when he was a month old (I don't know how they ate, but they did). Also there was her husband who was the eldest child in poor working class household with an absent alcoholic father and whose mother made ends meet cleaning houses. And then, of course, me, who grew up in children's homes and foster homes in the bowels of New Jersey. We are, all three of us, very successful in life. Living proof sitting at the table that the US offers an enormous degree of social mobility.

While, she, on the other hand, grew up in a wealthy family, went to an Ivy League school and was the least successful person at the table from both a professional stand point and a monetary one. I told her that she had grown up with a considerable disadvantage in comparison to the three of us, she wasn't offered a sufficient degree of adversity to overcome in life therefore she never developed the means with which to feel confident and secure enough to really advance.

My very first jobs were cleaning rich people's houses. How lucky or smart do you have to be to clean someone else's toilet? What I discovered through working for rich people was that they weren't any smarter than I was and that I was capable of doing pretty much any job they could. What was most important was I discovered (aside from the fact that rich people weren't any happier) was that if I was going to be successful, I had to stop resenting them for whatever apparent advantage they were handed because for the most part that "advantage" can frequently turn into a liability the same way my "disadvantage" become an advantage. The reason this is so is because when people have things that they themselves feel they haven't earned, it makes them feel as if they don't deserve what they have.

This is how poor people feel when they are handed charity, the person who does the giving feels great and the person on the receiving end feels like a lessor human. It's why they so frequently bite the hand that feeds. OTOH a pay check for a job well done feels pretty damned good. Even back in the days when I was cleaning houses and was paid a pittance, it felt good to get paid for the work I did, it was what made me equal to my employer. I gave them work and they gave me money and in the end, we owed each other nothing.

As to taxation levels, somewhere around 50%, assuming I'm on the winning side of things.

What is the winning side? The top half? The top half of all income tax filers in 2001 started at an adjusted gross of around 28K and makes just under $16 bucks an hour. So you think it's OK to take half of that for government services? You keep eight bucks and they get eight bucks?

Even the old Mafia used to let the poor saps they shook down for protection money keep more than that.