Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Classic TA Workplace -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Shack who wrote (86188)	11/20/2003 12:41:56 PM
From: The Freep	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 209892

So Shack, based on the high volume reversals, you think we retake the various wedges and negate the breakdowns? And since we didn't make new lows on that high volume reversal, where in the world are we in a wave count? A truncated 5th could work. (I would note that on the QQQ, for instance, there have been many hours in the past week or two with the same volume as the first hour or second hour, so it must be stock specific you were looking at?) I am betting that today will not end up as boring as the last period of intraday chop has been.... the freep

To: Shack who wrote (86188)	11/20/2003 12:54:22 PM
From: JRI	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 209892

Shack- on a couple other boards, some traders I respect are looking for a move to COMP 1940 (peak) over next day or so, and then down...they have called last down move well.. How would that play in with (potential) breakouts (in that area) and the high volume we saw this morn..? I'd think anything in 1930-1940 COMP range will push envelope on a lot of charts (valid reversals off recent lows) or still in room of error? Were you one of the 700k looking for tix for Edmonton-Montreal game? Wow...they shoulda scheduled 2 or 3 in a row (to fill demand) ng