Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Dayuhan who wrote (120705)	11/30/2003 5:09:11 PM
From: Nadine Carroll	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

Is that not what the Zionists did? As long as the Zionist objective was a Jewish State, there was nothing to negotiate, as that state by its fundamental nature would have excluded the existing non-Jewish population. What crap, Steven. Is that why Ben Gurion accepted a partition that didn't even include Jerusalem, with its 100,000 Jews? Is that why they made the Arabs remaining in Israeli citizens, while Jordan ethnically cleansed its Jews? All your arguments boil down to one theme - Arab sovereignty is ok, no matter how they treat their minorities, but Jewish sovereignty, even in a postage stamp (and the Partition of 47 wasn't much), why, that's illegitimate. Neither Arabs nor Jews had sovereignty under the Turk, nor Druze, nor Maronite, nor lots of other people. Only Arabs deserved it aftewards. That's your position.