Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : DON'T START THE WAR -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: rrufff who wrote (25447)	11/30/2003 11:48:29 PM
From: TigerPaw	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 25898

It is just so absurd that it actually takes away from the fight to get to the truth. Once again, you will find the Bush "conspiracy" is quite modest. It is spelled out by the Project for a New American Century on their web site and position papers. Basicly the Bush advisors wanted a "New Pearl Harbor" event, and they thought they were going to get one in the form of a plane hijacking. They sent Bush away, had the air force stand down and waited. The actual event was more than they bargained for, but they ran with the plan anyway. It is generally the neocon supporters who then repeat it in an absurd exaggeration and then claim it's crazy. It's a classic strawman argument. I saw Mrs. Connelly on Fox (A rare stop in my channel surfing). She gave a detailed and gripping account of holding her bleeding husband as she was hit by a spray of brain matter. There was no way to reconcile that vivid recollection with the idea of a single bullet causing Kennedy's head wound and Connelly's injury.