Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : DON'T START THE WAR -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: TigerPaw who wrote (25448)	12/1/2003 5:07:08 AM
From: GUSTAVE JAEGER	Respond to of 25898

Re: Basicly the Bush advisors wanted a "New Pearl Harbor" event, and they thought they were going to get one in the form of a plane hijacking. They sent Bush away, had the air force stand down and waited. Message 18436958 Message 17736352

To: TigerPaw who wrote (25448)	12/1/2003 5:31:07 AM
From: GUSTAVE JAEGER	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 25898

Footnote: Message 17785840 Message 17786260

To: TigerPaw who wrote (25448)	12/1/2003 8:41:48 AM
From: rrufff	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 25898

As I've posted, I tend to by cynical and am fairly open minded. It's a different world from 1963. I believe there was a far-reaching conspiracy then. In today's world, it would be impossible to keep the "secret" with the number of people that it would take to coordinate 9/11. The downside potential of getting caught far outweighs any upside benefit. Again, you can see by the responses from Gustave that the extremist view really hinders the finding of truth as I've suggested. Nutcake postings are less believable than government explanations sadly.