SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Neeka who wrote (18181)11/30/2003 1:15:35 PM
From: LindyBill  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 793640
 
GOP puts TV spotlight on Democrats' undermining
By David Limbaugh
Published November 30, 2003 Washington Times

Once again, Democrats, to divert the public's attention from their persistent obstruction in the war on terrorism, are falsely accusing Republicans of challenging their patriotism.
The flap concerns a 30-second Republican television ad showcasing Democratic resistance to President Bush's efforts to defeat international terrorism. The ad shows clips of Mr. Bush's last State of the Union address. In the first, he says that with just one vial or canister in the wrong hands this country could experience horror like never before.
In a later clip, Mr. Bush is shown pointing out that his opponents want to wait until the terrorist threat to us is imminent before taking action. They would prefer to retreat and put our national security in the hands of others, he says. A graphic then encourages people to support Mr. Bush's policy of pre-emptive self-defense.
Democrats, including Sen. Tom Daschle of South Dakota, started screaming bloody murder about the unfairness of the ad. You see, it's OK for Democrats to lie about Republicans wanting to starve schoolchildren, but it's wrong for Republicans to tell the truth about the Democrats' policies of appeasement toward terrorists and nations supporting them.
On NBC's "Meet the Press" last Sunday, Mr. Daschle said, "It's wrong. It's erroneous, and I think that they ought to pull the ad. We all want to defeat terrorism." But "to chastise and to question the patriotism of those who are in opposition to some of the president's plans I think is wrong."
What? Where in the ad did Mr. Bush question the Democrats' patriotism? He said nothing about that. He merely stated accurately their opposition to his policy of pre-emption and his decision to strike even without the approval of every nation on the planet.
Just what about those statements is wrong, Mr. Daschle? If you are ashamed that Mr. Bush is accurately characterizing your endless opposition, and if you think it makes you and your colleagues look unpatriotic, then perhaps you should consider changing your policies. But don't blame Mr. Bush for pointing out the folly of your policies. And don't issue disingenuous pre-emptive political strikes against Republicans claiming they have questioned your patriotism when they have not. But if that shoe fits and you don't like the way it looks -- that is, if you find it politically unstylish -- by all means, take it off.
Despite the Democrats' indignant protests about their patriotism, Mr. Bush is not making the charge that they are unpatriotic. But he is saying that their policies regarding the war on terrorism are reckless, foolish and contrary to our national security interests.
You see, when it comes to the war on terrorism, Democrats want to have it both ways. They want to appear supportive of our troops and the cause, but they insist on criticizing and undermining Mr. Bush every step of the way.
Early on, Democrats had to be dragged kicking and screaming to the table before they would reluctantly sign on to a resolution authorizing military action against Iraq. Being astute observers of the public mood, they climbed on board when they understood that the political winds were blowing strongly in favor of pre-emptive action against Saddam.
Before the invasion, they tried desperately to backpedal and make excuses, from charges of "unilateralism" to "imminent quagmire," obviously fearing that Mr. Bush's popularity as a wartime president would be nearly impossible to shake.
In the first phase of the war, they continued to whine, from repeated concerns about quagmires again to broken supply lines because of a precipitous ground war. Upon our decisive victory they began efforts to discredit it, from saying the Iraqis weren't welcoming us to complaining about stolen museum property.
During our laborious and thankless task of helping the Iraqi people to establish self-rule amidst terrorist-spawned resistance, they have chosen to focus their energies on criticizing the president for his alleged lack of a plan, instead of offering constructive assistance.
Over and over, they have given a little, then taken it back. Instead of "leaving politics at the water's edge," they have made partisanship their highest priority at the expense of the national interest.
Democrats would love nothing more than to intimidate Republicans from discussing their intrinsic weakness on national defense issues. In a time when our national security is under direct assault, they can't afford to bear the dovish image they usually wear so proudly.
Nothing is more legitimate than for Republicans to highlight their opponents' dangerous policies in the war on terrorism. Instead of withdrawing the ads, Republicans should produce dozens more and saturate the airwaves.

David Limbaugh is a nationally syndicated columnist.
washtimes.com



To: Neeka who wrote (18181)11/30/2003 4:46:15 PM
From: michael97123  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 793640
 
some good news
Ambushers killed in battle with U.S. forces
Sunday, November 30, 2003 Posted: 4:07 PM EST (2107 GMT)


TIKRIT, Iraq (CNN) -- U.S. troops thwarted an attempt to ambush a military convoy Sunday afternoon in northern Iraq, killing 46 attackers, wounding 18 and capturing eight, military officials said.

Five U.S. soldiers were wounded, according to sources with the Army's 4th Infantry Division.

CNN Walter Rodgers in Baghdad said there was a running battle after the ambush in which the insurgents were overwhelmed.

The battle comes at the end of a month that has proved the deadliest for coalition forces since the war began, and at the end of a weekend in which 15 people have been killed in attacks on troops, diplomats, agents and contractors from countries participating in the U.S.-led coalition in Iraq.

Despite the attacks on both military and civilian targets U.S. and coalition officials reiterated their determination to stay in Iraq.

Two South Korean power company contractors were killed and two others wounded, one critically, in an attack in northern Iraq, South Korean officials said. (Full story)

On Saturday, Iraqi insurgents killed seven Spanish intelligence agents and wounded another as their convoy moved south from Baghdad. Spain's defense minister called the highway ambush an "assassination."

Two Japanese diplomats and their Iraqi driver were shot and killed near Tikrit when they made a stop for food en route to an Iraqi reconstruction conference, U.S. military and Japanese officials said.

Assailants armed with rocket-propelled grenades and small arms ambushed a U.S. military convoy east of Qusaybah near Iraq's border with Syria, killing two U.S. soldiers and wounding another, according to the Coalition Press Information Center.

And coalition officials say a civilian -- a senior security representative of a U.S. company providing contracted services in Iraq -- was shot and killed Saturday as he drove to a U.S. base north of Baghdad near Balad.

The representative was a citizen of Colombia and an employee of Kellogg Brown & Root Services, a subsidiary of Halliburton Co., U.S. Gen. Mark Kimmitt said. Colombia is among the members of the coalition.

With the deaths of the two U.S. soldiers Saturday, the number of coalition troops killed in Iraq during November reached 100 -- more than in March or April, when the war was in full force. Eighty-eight of the soldiers died under hostile fire.

The deaths include 81 Americans, 17 Italians killed in the bombing of the Italian military headquarters in Nasiriya, a British soldier who died in a traffic accident and a Polish major killed when his convoy was shelled. (Deaths by month)

And the U.S. military Sunday admitted the downing of two Black Hawk helicopters, which collided in midair over Mosul, was probably the result of a rocket-propelled grenade fired at one of the aircraft.

Army officer Col. Joe Anderson said that while the investigation into the November 15 crash is not conclusive, "it appears that the collision was caused by one of them being hit by something from the ground, probably a rocket."

A coalition spokesman said Iraqi insurgents "are trying to break the coalition's will."

"The overwhelming majority of the Iraqi people are grateful for the liberation, and they don't want us to leave," Coalition Provisional Authority spokesman Dan Senyor said.

Brig. Gen. Mark Kimmitt, a coalition military spokesman, said the attacks reflected the insurgents' apparent shift from military targets to civilian or diplomatic "soft" targets.

"We have said for the last couple of weeks that we have seen the enemy starting to attack soft targets, Iraqi targets, rather than military targets," Kimmitt said. "He is attempting to intimidate the people of Iraq. He will not succeed."


Coalition forces secure the road near where seven Spanish intelligence agents were killed in Iraq.
In Madrid, a transport plane carrying the bodies of the seven slain Spaniards landed Sunday night at an air base near the capital.

Earlier, Spanish Prime Minister Jose Maria Aznar told his nation in a televised address that Spain would stay in Iraq and continue to support the U.S-led coalition despite the agents' deaths. (Full story)

Spain has about 1,300 troops in Iraq stationed in the Polish-controlled sector of the country between Baghdad and Basra.

The Japanese victims were identified as Katsuhiko Oku, 45, who worked for the Japanese Embassy in London and who had been in Iraq for several months, and Masamori Inoue, 30, who worked for the Japanese Embassy in Baghdad.

Foreign Minister Yoriko Kawaguchi said the attack occurred as the two men were traveling to attend an Iraqi reconstruction conference.

"There's no change in the Japanese government's foreign policy," Kawaguchi said. Japan will not close its embassy in Baghdad and officials are not considering reducing staffing levels there, she added. (Full story)

Hours before Saturday's attacks, Lt. Gen. Ricardo Sanchez, head of coalition ground forces in Iraq, told reporters that attacks against coalition forces in Iraq had dropped by 30 percent over the past two weeks.

He said the average of 22 engagements per day over the past week was down from more than 35 per day in prior weeks.

That trend, however, has reversed for Iraqis working with the U.S.-led coalition.

Since the start of Ramadan, attacks on Iraqis have more than doubled, Sanchez said, noting in the 32 days since the start of the Muslim holy month, 74 attacks had been directed against Iraqi civilians and government officials and 82 attacks against Iraqi security forces.