SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Ask God -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Jamey who wrote (35916)11/30/2003 6:51:24 PM
From: Sidney Reilly  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 39621
 
If Revelation was written in 86 AD, I believe that John would have mentioned that most horrific event in the lives of the Jews in his revelation. He does not because he is seeing 70 AD before the fact!

That does not sound reasonable to me. Why would John talk about anything but the Revelation God was giving him? God said to write what he was shown! He wouldn't write anything else. And there would be no reason to mention past history in a Revelation God was giving about future events anyhow. John would be faithful in what he recorded.



To: Jamey who wrote (35916)11/30/2003 8:51:13 PM
From: Berry Picker  Respond to of 39621
 
You are right James - the time of repentance was past.
Those who had rejected the Gospel were to be left in their sin
because they were OUT OF TIME

Revelation 22:11 He that is unjust, let him be unjust still:
and he which is filthy, let him be filthy still:
and he that is righteous, let him be righteous still:
and he that is holy, let him be holy still.

The TIME HAD COME the wrath of the Lamb of God was about to be poured out.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News