RAGE ON BROTHER SPIRIT!
Well, you started of badly in that post, but it became a decent rant by second paragraph.....
Re: Nah, you're going too far. The Bush family isn't that smart though Cheney and Baker are
I'm sorry that you didn't understand that the BUSH CRIME FAMILY™, Inc. (or "BCFI", easily confused with BCCI, since both are crime shops) is more of a description of a Mafia operation than a literally blood related cabal. For instance. Jim Baker is part of BCFI, and serves a key role as consiglieri to the family and its interests. Thus, when the families of the victims of 9/11 decided to sue the Saudi Arabian government and the Saudi royal family for billions in compensation for their role in 9/11, who did the BCFI call on to defend the Saudis? Jim Baker, of course. Oil Slick Dick is another charter BCFI member. He's part brain-truster and part enforcer. A unique sort of combination of heavy-weight intimidator who really imposes the will of BCFI in the most dramatic fashion both inside the Homeland™ (U.S. Pat.Pend.) and in the External Affairs Dept. of BCFI, formerly known (very quaintly) as "the rest of the world".
***
Re: The ones they've taken care to cover up for are the Saudis
Right, but dig deeper and you'll find the Saudis are merely a red herring to distract you from the BCFI's own nefarious plotting.
****
Re: I submit they were counted on to help Enron and others to rig energy prices upward during the 2000 election.
You will have to provide us with some proof of this. It is quite hard for me to accept that view. To what end would the Saudis have raised rates, other than for their own financial benefit? Clearly, in October, 2000 when Clinton had to release oil from the SPR in order to quell the speculative bubble at NYMEX that had driven the spot price to $37/bbb for WTI (West Texas Intermediate), the Saudis were endorsing the views of Ali Rodriguez, Chairman of OPEC who was attempting to drive crude oil prices back down to the band that OPEC had established at $22-28/bbl.
I think you got your facts wrong. Prove up! :)
********
Re: It was a win-win situation for all of them as they hurt the Clinton-Gore economy, destroyed Grey Davis, robbed Dem California, raised an issue Gore had no answer to (because the oil cabal is so secretive and under no government power) and plundered tens of billions.
Way too many leaps of faith on this one. The real reason that Gore didn't attack the energy industry head on was because he was engaged in back room deals to get the U.S. military to go down to Columbia to suppress patriotic movements that were attacking the Occidental Petroleum pipeline on a nearly daily basis. Since a lot of Gore's net worth is tied up in Oxy Pete holdings, he was simply (and typically thuggishly) trying to use the military in yet another racket to further his own self-interest.
Gore knew exactly what was going on strategically with the rape of Calfornia, and the only thing that might have gotten him interested was if it were a battleground state. As it were, California was in his back pocket, so he could ignore the energy mess and enjoy the fact that he wasn't thereby totally destroying Democratic Congressional chances in energy producing states. You do follow the electoral calculus on this, right? If you think that's a stretch, you ought to read "Bush's Brain" and see how a real master, Karl Rove, applies this sort of electoral triangulation to politics. If he weren't evil (and also a key member of the BCFI) he would have my vote as one of the geniuses of our era. As it is, I simply regard him as one of the most effective criminals of this, or any age.
*******
Re: Therefore, it comes as no surprise that Bush-Cheney would quash investigations into the Saudi funding of terrorism after they took power. That resulted in 9-11.
Show me proof. I've read a lot on the topic and I think you are not going far enough in your prosecution. The Saudis may or may not have been funding the cells that were allegedly active on 9/11. Because there is no direct evidence that al Qaeda actually had any involvement whatsoever in 9/11, you are leaping to several conclusions.
One thing has been discovered however that is on the record, verified and clear evidence that there was a connection between fundamentalists in Pakistan and Mohammed Atta. I am referring, of course to the $100,000 that was sent by the head of the Pakistani secret police, the ISI, to Atta in the weeks prior to 9/11. That is a verified fact. Whether or not Mohammed Atta was on the plane that crashed into the World Trade Center is still merely a matter of speculation. The best proof that he was not is the purported passport that somehow miraculously escaped from his coat's breast pocket or a carry-on valise, fluttered into the air in a raging inferno, miraculously showed not one speck of ash or a singed corner and landed a couple blocks from the site of the crash and was found by two very (shall we say extremely lucky) FBI agents. And they say miracles don't happen.
Anyone who believes the whopper on Atta's passport really ought to pick up one of the greatest works of fiction of the 20th Century, the Warren Commission report, and read about "the single bullet theory". They'll enjoy the amazing tales that we tell ourselves, when deluding and disinforming the public is of the essence.
*****
Re: Saddam's importance in all this is that since he attacked Kuwait Bushies have seen that as the perfect excuse for invasion and seizing their oil-fields.
What do you mean "since", kimosabe? The BCFI isn't that sloppy, ferchissakes. They knew before Saddam Hussein attacked just which of Hussein's emotional buttons they had to push in order to get him to react. They pushed the "slant-drilling into Rumailia button™", and they pushed the "Kuwait sells the stolen oil to drive prices down and bankrupt Iraq button™". That was the sting. Then they set the hook when they had Ambassador April Glaspie (BCFI member), Ambassador Margaret Tutwiler (BCFI member) and a State Department spokesman all deny that the U.S. would respond after Hussein made several diplomatic overtures about correcting the Iraq-Kuwait dispute by invading Kuwait. The shock expressed by George H.W. Bush in the aftermath of the Kuwait invasion remains to this day one of the great theatrical events to ever have been creatively orchestrated by the Script Department of BCFI.
Once the hook was set, George Bush just reeled in that fat Iraqi kingfish. Think about the movie, "The Sting" and imagine BCFI hall-of-famers -- Bush, Cheney and Baker -- as Henry Gondorf's gang, and Saddam Hussein as Doyle Lonigan, and you have a better idea of how Saddam got snookered. :)
*******
Re: It's all very corrupt and they cannot tell us the truth about it or they'd be impeached. That is why they keep spinning lies and wild excuses.
You are a master of understatement. It is all wildly, extravagantly, extremely, radically corrupt. Impeached? This sort of treason around the world has traditionally resulted in live boilings, impalements, live drawings and quarterings, crucifixions and/or burning at the stake.
Excuses? What are our excuses for not securing justice? |
