Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : DON'T START THE WAR -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: TigerPaw who wrote (25485)	12/4/2003 8:32:59 PM
From: Raymond Duray	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 25898

I find it mightly creepy that W's brother was having dinner with Hinkley's brother the night before the shooting. Pretty much the same cast of characters. At the time, I was so busy with my business career that the event was one which I barely caught the headlines on. It is only now that I have the luxury to read and research that the dimensions of this plot really start to come alive. The one thing that might be said in favor of the official story is that if the Bushs were sincerely interested in assassinating Reagan, that it would have been astoundingly poor planning to have used a member of a family with whom the Bush's were on a first name basis. In any Mafia hit, or CIA operation (which Bush 41 would be intimately familiar with) the first rule is "plausible deniability" and the second rule is compartmentalization. In the case of John Hinkley, both precepts would have been violated, and I just don't think George H.W. Bush would be that sloppy. I tend toward the view that the dinner the evening before was simply a remarkable coincidence, and nothing more. I really hate to disappoint my readers on the Right who are certain that I'm nothing more than a crackpot conspiracy theorist. Sorry, guys.