SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : WHO IS RUNNING FOR PRESIDENT IN 2004 -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: calgal who wrote (7743)12/17/2003 10:55:34 PM
From: calgal  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 10965
 
Kerry Charts Complex Course on War
Candidate Balances His Support for Iraq Resolution With Criticism of Bush
By Edward Walsh
Washington Post Staff Writer
Tuesday, December 16, 2003; Page A08

CHARITON, Iowa, Dec. 15 -- The capture of Saddam Hussein has not changed Barbara Paulding's opinion about the war in Iraq or how she intends to vote in her precinct caucus Jan. 19 as Iowa Democrats begin the process of selecting their party's presidential nominee.



She was among about 50 people seated at tables in Donna's Place, a cafe here, Monday morning when one of the Democratic candidates came bounding in to begin another day of campaigning. Sen. John F. Kerry (Mass.) greeted the diners at their tables, delivered a standard stump speech and fielded questions on health care, steel imports, stem cell research and other topics. The subject of the war did not come up in the questioning until Kerry turned to Paulding, 66.

The retired teacher at Indian Hills Community College here said she was "ashamed" that her country had started the war.

"I'm as angry as you are about the way George Bush took us to war," Kerry replied. He went on to say that he voted for the resolution authorizing the use of force in Iraq because he thought it was important to "stand up to Saddam Hussein" and because of intelligence data indicating that Iraq still had weapons of mass destruction.

"The responsible position was to get the [weapons] inspectors back in and to go through the process of disarmament, which was exactly what we were doing under Bill Clinton," he said. "The irresponsible thing to do was to ignore the inspectors, ignore the building of a coalition and rush to war."

Neither Kerry's answer nor the capture of Hussein swayed Paulding from her commitment to the Democrats' leading and most vocal critic of the Iraq war, former Vermont governor Howard Dean. "We had no right to be there in the first place," she said.

Kerry has been struggling to win over voters such as Paulding from the beginning of his campaign. When he entered the race, he was widely seen as a formidable candidate, a decorated Vietnam War veteran with years of experience in both foreign and domestic policy. But Dean has been able to ride a wave of antiwar sentiment among hard-core Democrats to the front of the race. Meanwhile, Kerry has been forced to chart a more complex course, simultaneously defending his support for the use of force while sharply criticizing Bush's conduct of the war.

Whether the dramatic capture of the deposed Iraqi president will change the political equation in the Democratic race is not clear. But in the interview, Kerry suggested that Dean's antiwar position should now come under closer scrutiny.

"I think it raises serious issues about people who didn't have a position," he said. Asked if he was referring to Dean, he said, "There are several people in the race, but there is certainly one person who didn't."

At a news conference in Des Moines, Kerry was more critical of Dean, saying that he had just delivered "a foreign policy speech written by somebody else."

"I think it underscores the question of experience," he said. "There really is a very significant difference here. Who is ready to be president of the United States and [provide] what we need today? When you talk about tone and nuance, I think particularly the tone and nuance have been lacking in most of what has preceded us in this campaign. What people want is somebody who can lead America to a safer and stronger place, who has a demonstrated record of leadership. I have that record."

Kerry said Dean had voiced support for a congressional resolution that "in fact gave the president authority to go to war" and had said that Hussein should be disarmed. "Now how can you have it both ways?" he asked. "What kind of leadership is that? Let's be accountable for our words. Those are the words he spoke; that's the position he took. Now he's speaking a very different language."

Kerry's theme since Hussein's capture has been that it creates "a golden opportunity" to do what he said Bush should have done before invading Iraq: build an international coalition to help in the war and its aftermath. "You can bet that our troops would want us to do whatever it takes to bring in other countries and reduce the target on the backs of our troops," he said at a senior citizens center in Des Moines.

Kerry's criticism of Bush's conduct of the war and his call for the United States to reach out to other countries for help in Iraq was well received in the Iowa towns he visited during a three-day campaign swing. He and his aides believe that he is slowly climbing back into contention in this key state. According to an internal poll made available by Kerry aides, he has moved to within 4 percentage points of Dean in Iowa and is in a virtual dead heat with Rep. Richard A. Gephardt (Mo.), the early front-runner here.

His converts do not include Paulding, but that does not mean that he has not made an impression on Dean supporters like her.

"I'm very impressed with Senator Kerry," Paulding said. "If he gets the nomination, he's going to have my full support."


© 2003 The Washington Post Company

URL:http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A3305-2003Dec15.html



To: calgal who wrote (7743)12/18/2003 8:59:15 AM
From: Glenn Petersen  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 10965
 
Westi,

I agree, the race is far from over. While Gore's endorsement has cemented his front runner status, it also forces his rivals to rachet up the tone of their critical commentary. I think that Clark is emerging as the alternative, and he may actually be a closet Republican.

Did you notice the CBS poll that has Kerry trailing Sharpton? AS keeps hoping that Kerry will become the "Come Back Kid." He actually appears to be the "Comatose Kid."

Dean's Remarks Give Rivals Talking Points

His Readiness to Lead Is Questioned


washingtonpost.com

By Jim VandeHei and Jonathan Finer

Washington Post Staff Writers

Thursday, December 18, 2003; Page A01

BURLINGTON, Vt. -- Howard Dean's penchant for flippant and sometimes false statements is generating increased criticism from his Democratic presidential rivals and raising new questions about his ability to emerge as a nominee who can withstand intense, sustained scrutiny and defeat President Bush.

Dean, for instance, recently spoke of a "most interesting theory" that Saudi Arabia had "warned" Bush about the terrorist attacks of Sept. 11, 2001. Although Dean said he does not believe Bush was tipped off about the assaults that killed nearly 3,000, he has made no apologies for raising the rumor.

"How is what I did different from what Dick Cheney or George Bush . . . did during the time of the buildup of the invasion of Iraq?" the former Vermont governor said Tuesday night aboard his campaign plane. "There were all these theories that they mentioned. Many of them turned out not to be true. The difference is that I acknowledged that I did not believe the theory I was putting out."

Bush this week called the theory an "absurd insinuation."

Dean's remarks, his critics say, are in keeping with his history of making statements that are mean-spirited or misleading. He has distorted his past support for raising the retirement age for Social Security and slowing Medicare's growth. He has falsely said he was the only Democratic presidential candidate talking about race before white audiences. And he made allegations -- some during his years as governor -- that turned out to be untrue.

After saying at his last gubernatorial news conference that he was sealing his official records to avoid political embarrassment, Dean now says he was joking and is not sure what is in the files.

When Rep. Richard A. Gephardt (D-Mo.) unveiled his health care plan in April, Dean, through his campaign, belittled the lawmaker's record on the subject. Dean later walked away from the statement, saying it did not reflect his views. But this fall, in debates and TV ads, Dean has resurrected the criticism, accusing his congressional rivals, including Gephardt, of producing only rhetoric on health care in comparison to his record in Vermont.

In recent days, Sen. John F. Kerry (D-Mass.) said Dean lacks the "credibility" to be president and accused him of misleading voters about past remarks on Iraq. One example cited by Kerry's campaign: Dean recently said, "I never said Saddam was a danger to the United States. Ever." But in September 2002, Dean told CBS's "Face the Nation": "There is no question that Saddam Hussein is a threat to the United States. The question is: Is he an immediate threat?"

With polls suggesting Dean is pulling away from his rivals, they are stepping up their criticisms on several fronts, including foreign policy, government experience and credibility. Dean spokesman Jay Carson, asked about the challenges to his boss's veracity, said Wednesday: "That's all they do now: attack Howard Dean."

Last week, after Dean denied providing a tax break as governor that benefited Enron Corp. -- which a published report showed he did -- Gephardt said: "Once again, Howard Dean refuses to admit the truth. You can't beat George W. Bush if you can't tell the truth about your own record."

Tricia Enright, a Dean spokeswoman, called the quarrel a difference of "interpretation." Dean, she said, restructured the Vermont tax code for scores of companies and did not provide a specific break to Enron.

To be sure, plenty of presidential candidates have bent facts and stretched figures to sharpen a point or blunt criticism. And interviews this year suggest that many voters give Dean high marks for speaking his mind.

"To a great extent, the public does not give a damn" about the claims against Dean, said former representative Tony Coelho (D-Calif.), chairman of Al Gore's 2000 campaign. Voters want straight-talking leaders, he said, and former governors such as Dean have "a tendency to say what they think without having everything checked out before they do things."

On Tuesday, when several rivals criticized him for saying America is not safer after Hussein's capture, Dean did not back away. "You know me; if I think something's true, I say it," he told reporters. But critics note he sometimes says things that are not true.

In January, Dean told an abortion rights audience about a young patient he believed had been impregnated by her father. He was explaining why he opposes parental notification requirements for girls and young women seeking an abortion. But Dean later told Jake Tapper of Salon.com that he learned several years ago that "her father was not the father of her child; it was more complicated than that."

Carson said Wednesday that Dean's January anecdote "wasn't misleading at all. The story illustrates the downside of [mandatory] parental notification, and is an example from the life experience of the governor."

Some of Dean's opponents in his gubernatorial campaigns say he was prone to misleading statements then.

In a 1998 debate, Dean and GOP candidate Ruth Dwyer argued over new regulations for large farms in Vermont. Dwyer told of Bristol farmer Bob Hill, who struggled to build a barn for his 600 cows while complying with the state's strict permit requirements.

The next day, Dean told the Associated Press he had "done a little research on that farmer. He's in violation of the natural resource conservation service laws." Dean later acknowledged he was wrong and apologized to Hill.

Several Vermont legislators from both parties who served while Dean was governor said they rarely found cause to question his honesty and chalked up his controversial comments to misspeaking. "He could be trusted and knew better than to lie to us," said Cheryl Rivers, a former Democratic state senator who sometimes clashed with Dean. "Yes, he would shoot from the hip, but it was not deliberate or malicious."

But lately, as he courts liberal Democrats nationwide, Dean has distorted portions of his record as governor, when he was generally considered a centrist. He has repeatedly denied siding with Republicans such as then-Speaker Newt Gingrich (R-Ga.) in 1995 in calling for slowing Medicare's annual growth from 10 percent to 7 percent, even though he told a Vermont newspaper he "fully subscribed" to the idea.

Vermont Abenaki Indian leaders said they were outraged last month to see Dean onstage at a Native American conference in Albuquerque. For more than a decade, they said, his administration vigorously opposed their quest for state and federal recognition, contending the Indians might make land claims and bring casinos to Vermont.

Dean drew raucous applause from his New Mexico audience when he endorsed the benefits of tribal gambling establishments. "Needless to say, to hear him say onstage in Albuquerque that he was in favor of gaming for federally recognized tribes came as a big shock to a lot of people in Vermont," said Jeff Benay, a Dean appointee who heads the Vermont Governor's Advisory Council on Indian Affairs and who has advised Dean's campaign.

Carson, responding Wednesday to the Abenaki issue, said: "It would be inappropriate for the state to recognize them before the federal government does."

The dust-up over the Saudi question began Dec. 1, on WAMU-FM's nationally syndicated "Diane Rehm Show," when Dean was asked why Bush was suppressing information from a commission looking into the Sept. 11 attacks.

"The most interesting theory that I've heard so far -- which is nothing more than a theory, it can't be proved -- is that he was warned ahead of time by the Saudis," Dean replied. "Now who knows what the real situation is? But the trouble is by suppressing that kind of information, you lead to those kinds of theories, whether they have any truth to them or not, and they get repeated as fact."

When asked a few days later on Fox News why he said it, Dean said, "because there are people who believe it. . . . I don't believe it . . . but it would be nice to know." A campaign aide said Dean heard the rumor from various people on the campaign trail.

Staff writer Dan Balz and researcher Lucy Shackelford contributed to this report.

© 2003 The Washington Post Company