SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Stockman Scott's Political Debate Porch -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: sylvester80 who wrote (33300)12/22/2003 2:24:51 AM
From: Raymond Duray  Respond to of 89467
 
A Democrat walks up to the Pearly Gates.......

Message 19619667



To: sylvester80 who wrote (33300)12/22/2003 4:23:42 AM
From: Raymond Duray  Respond to of 89467
 
WSWS : News & Analysis : Middle East : Iraq

wsws.org

US military metes out collective punishment to Iraqi city

By Peter Symonds
22 December 2003

Despite the attempts of the Bush administration and international media to claim the capture of Saddam Hussein as a major
breakthrough in suppressing armed resistance, events on the ground in Iraq speak otherwise. As the attacks on US troops and
Iraqi collaborators continue unabated, the response of the US military has been to intensify its heavy-handed repression aimed
at terrorising the Iraqi people into submission.


Just days after Hussein’s detention, some 2,500 US soldiers sealed off Samarra, a city of 200,000 people, in the early hours of
December 17 and set about smashing their way into homes and factories in search of “insurgents”. It was a classic reprisal raid,
not unlike those carried out by Israeli troops against the Palestinian population, or for that matter by the Nazis against villages
and towns accused of harbouring resistance fighters in occupied Europe.


The Pentagon identified Samarra as a “hotspot” after two separate US convoys were ambushed simultaneously on November
30. American troops responded and claimed to have scored “a significant victory” by killing 54 of the attackers. However,
journalists who later questioned hospital staff and local residents, found an entirely different story: that US soldiers had fired
indiscriminately, killing nine civilians including a child and an elderly Iranian pilgrim, and wounding others.

On December 15, US troops were ambushed again. Military spokesmen claimed that 11 “insurgents” had been killed, but like
the earlier clash, failed to produce any evidence. According to veteran Middle East journalist Robert Fisk, the only dead man
to be found was a vegetable seller. The following day, American soldiers raided a nearby village and detained more than 70
people, including an alleged rebel commander Qais Hatten.

December 17’s huge operation, however, was clearly planned well in advance. US military planners decided the city had to be
taught a lesson. Or as Lieutenant Colonel Nate Sassaman told the media afterward: “Samarra has been a little bit of a thorn in
our side. It hasn’t come along as quickly as other cities in the rebuilding of Iraq. This operation is designed to bring them up to
speed.”

Operation Ivy Blizzard began at 2 a.m. Troops from the Army’s 4th Infantry Division, backed by Apache attack helicopters
and F-16 fighters, blocked the main routes and poured into the city. “Using sledgehammers, crowbars, explosives and
armoured vehicles, US forces smashed down the gates of homes and the doors of workshops and junkyards to attack the Iraqi
resistance that has persisted despite the capture of Saddam Hussein,” Associated Press reported.

According to other accounts, US troops detonated plastic explosives to break open doors. In one of the city’s industrial areas,
the military used Bradley Fighting Vehicles to ram through the doors of warehouses and workshops. US military officials cited
by the Los Angeles Times described the operation as a “robust response” to insurgents in Samarra. Others explained that a
force of some 1,500 fighters was conducting attacks on US troops as well as police and civilians working for the US
occupation authorities.

In a sinister development, hooded men described as “Iraqi civil corpsmen” accompanied the US troops. One of them told the
Los Angeles Times: “This is a tribal town, and everyone knows everyone else. If someone knows who I am, they will surely try
to kill me as a collaborator. The resistance is everywhere here.” While he did not explain his role in the operation, the obvious
function of such Iraqi militia is to finger and interrogate suspected “insurgents”.


The US soldiers had been primed for the task. Staff Sergeant Tome Walker told the press: “They hyped this place like it was
the Wild West. We heard there were two factions of foreign fighters, and Fedayeen Saddam [Hussein’s paramilitary forces].
We haven’t seen it yet. Maybe later in the week.” By the end of the day, 86 people had been detained, just 12 of whom were
on the US list of targets, and a cache containing 200 automatic rifles and some bomb-making material had been uncovered.

According to the US military, several civilians were wounded but no one was killed. But as on previous occasions, this bland
statement proved to be a mixture of lies and callous indifference to the suffering, not to speak of the anger and resentment,
which had been caused.
A dispatch by Robert Fisk entitled “Shooting Samarra’s schoolboys in the back” reported at least one
fatality—a taxi driver Amer Baghdadi who was shot dead by US troops. Other casualties were in the Samarra hospital.

Maouloud Hussein, 31, was shot in the back as he tried to shepherd his family into the back room of their house. His brother
Hamid Hussein angrily declared: “You said you would bring us freedom and democracy but what are we supposed to think?
My neighbour, the Americans took him in front of his wife and two children and tied his hands behind his back, and then, a few
hours later, after all this humiliation, they came and told his wife to take all her most expensive things and they put explosives in
their house and blew it up. He is a farmer. He is innocent. What have we done to deserve this?”

Issam Naim Hamid, 17, was in the emergency ward with a bullet wound to his stomach. His mother, Manal, explained that US
troops had come to their home at around 3 a.m. and fired through the gate. As the family huddled for protection, one of the
bullets hit Issam and another hit his father who was in a serious condition in Tikrit hospital. Manal was terrified that they would
bleed to death as the US troops refused to allow anyone to leave the house for several hours.

In a separate interview with the Los Angeles Times, Manal, a teacher, denounced the heavy-handed methods of the US
military. “The best thing America can do for us is go home and let us take care of our own security. This will only make the
resistance stronger... How can the Americans treat us this way? Where is the democracy they promised us?” she asked.

Asked to comment on the impact of the operation on civilians, Colonel Frederick Rudesheim, commander of one of the 4th
Infantry Division’s combat teams, was completely unapologetic. “Certainly we’ve inconvenienced a number of citizens of
Samarra. But these same citizens are the ones who’ve been living for months with terrorists among them,” he said.

Rudesheim’s comments reveal the logic behind Operation Ivy Blizzard. It is not only the resistance groups that are being
blamed for the attacks on US troops. All of the city’s residents, “who’ve been living for months with terrorists,” are being held
responsible. The response was a form of collective punishment, aimed at intimidating and terrorising the city as a whole. The
US military is increasingly resorting to such methods to pacify a population that is becoming more and more hostile to the
neo-colonial occupation of the country.


It is significant that the US military has singled out Samarra for special attention. Prior to the US invasion, the city and its tribal
leaders were regarded as anti-Hussein—traditionally it had been a rival to Hussein’s hometown of Tikrit. As Ali Hussein,
35-year-old labourer, exclaimed to the press: “Saddam accused us of being against him, and now the Americans accuse us of
being with Saddam.” If Samarra has now become a “hotbed”, it is one more indication of the extent of the opposition to the US
occupation.

The US military claims that there has been a significant decline in the level of attacks in Samarra. The city has been placed
under an 11 p.m. to 4 a.m. curfew. The arrests have continued. Any lull, however, is dependent on the presence of large
numbers of US troops and is therefore only temporary. One “insurgent” told the Washington Post: “There is a total siege of
the city. They are all over the streets. If we hit them, people are bound to get hurt. If one shot is fired, the whole street will be
shot up.”

Elsewhere, the anti-US attacks and American reprisals continue unabated. Over the weekend, guerrillas struck oil storage
tanks in southern Baghdad, blew up a pipeline in the al-Mashahda area north of the capital and fired a rocket-propelled
grenade on a US military convoy in Mosul. The US military continued its raids and house-to-house searches in Fallujah and
Rawah, as well as Samarra.



To: sylvester80 who wrote (33300)12/22/2003 11:43:50 AM
From: Karen Lawrence  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 89467
 
nydailynews.com/front/story/148326p-130848c.html

WASHINGTON - The United States was thrown back into high alert for the holidays yesterday as the feds warned that terrorists may be planning attacks that "rival or exceed" 9/11.
The worrisome chatter intercepted by the nation's terror hunters is "perhaps greater now than at any point since Sept. 11, 2001," said Homeland Security Secretary Tom Ridge.

Worse, the fears involve the possible use of weapons of mass destruction, top U.S. sources have told the Daily News.

"The information we have indicates that extremists abroad are anticipating near-term attacks that they believe will either rival or exceed the attacks that occurred in New York and the Pentagon and the fields of Pennsylvania," Ridge said.

The disturbing news, coming just four days before Christmas, had authorities from New York to Chicago and San Francisco scrambling to boost security.

While New York is mentioned in almost every threat picked up by intelligence agencies, this time the threat may be stronger elsewhere, senior U.S. officials told The News



To: sylvester80 who wrote (33300)12/22/2003 4:29:22 PM
From: jlallen  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 89467
 
Dean ought to consider this....

"It is not the critic who counts, not the man who points out how the strong man stumbled, or where the doer of deeds could have done better. The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena; whose face is marred by the dust and sweat and blood; who strives valiantly; who errs and comes short again and again; who knows the great enthusiasms, the great devotions and spends himself in a worthy course; who at the best, knows in the end the triumph of high achievement, and who, at worst, if he fails, at least fails while daring greatly; so that his place shall never be with those cold and timid souls who know neither victory or defeat."

--Theodore Roosevelt