SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Lane3 who wrote (21441)12/25/2003 1:06:33 AM
From: LindyBill  Respond to of 793778
 
Candidates Turn to Web to Keep Cash Flow Constant

By Brian Faler
Special to The Washington Post
Thursday, December 25, 2003; Page A06

The ad was only hours old when the Dean campaign put out the call: "Dean attacked in despicable ad that uses images of bin Laden," the campaign wrote, in a text message sent to supporters' cell phones. "The bat is up -- don't tread on Dean!"

Americans for Jobs, Health Care and Progressive Values, a Democratic group that has refused to identify its sponsors, had launched a searing television ad questioning the former Vermont governor's expertise in foreign affairs.

But before the ad had even hit many newspapers, the Dean campaign was using the spot to rally its supporters -- and raise some money. The campaign put a link to the ad on its Web site, beneath the tag line "Democrats are Better Than This." In e-mails, blog entries and text messages, the campaign urged its supporters to contribute $400,000 by midnight that day, in a show of support for the candidate. A picture of a baseball bat on the Web site -- doubling as a thermometer of sorts -- kept track of the progress.

In about four days, the campaign -- while denouncing the ad and demanding that it be taken down -- collected more than $550,000 from 7,700 contributors.

The technique is a change from how money was usually raised online in the 2000 election. During the race for the GOP presidential nomination, the Internet was heralded for enabling Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.) to cash in on a tidal wave of support that followed his surprise win in the New Hampshire primary. Within weeks of that victory, McCain had collected more than $4 million online.

This year, some campaigns -- most notably Dean's -- are increasingly using the Web to capitalize on not only the tidal waves but also the everyday swells. With the telethon-style fundraisers -- with their specific goals, urgent deadlines and icons "counting" the donations -- the candidates are helping turn the sometimes mundane job of fundraising into calls to arm, and to give.

"You're taking advantage of the excitement of the moment. You're tapping into impulse buying -- or impulse giving," said Michael Cornfield of George Washington University's Institute for Politics, Democracy and the Internet. "You can't do that in any other fundraising medium -- except if you have a live television broadcast with operators standing by, which is just prohibitively expensive."

Dean held its first such fundraiser this summer, when, in anticipation of the Federal Election Commission's June 30 deadline for reporting fundraising totals, it posted the bat on its Web site, urged its followers to give and updated the site every half-hour. The campaign, as widely reported, finished the quarter with a total of $7.6 million -- enough to thrust Dean into the Democratic field's upper tier.

Since then, the campaign has gone back to the well. In July, the campaign challenged its supporters to raise as much as Vice President Cheney would at a traditional fundraiser he was attending in South Carolina. Dean raised $508,000. The next month, the campaign collected $1 million in an online effort to counter a GOP fundraiser, hosted by President Bush. Another end-of-the-quarter effort brought in $5 million.

A Halloween-themed effort took in $354,000. In November, the campaign raised $609,000 in response to an ad from the Republican National Committee. Weeks later, Dean supporters came up with $286,000, in opposition to an ad from the anti-tax group Club for Growth. Earlier this month, when former vice president Al Gore endorsed Dean, the campaign posted the bat again -- to "thank" Gore -- and raised $695,000.

Dean has since launched yet another online telethon, this one to raise $1.5 million by the end of the year.

"Every time someone has attacked us, we've raised more money to counter them than they've spent against us," said Dean's campaign manager, Joe Trippi.

Many of his Democratic rivals, spying an effective way to raise money -- and hoping to replicate Dean's successes -- have launched similar efforts. Retired Army Gen. Wesley K. Clark is urging his supporters to give $1 million by the end of this month. Sen. Joseph I. Lieberman (Conn.) asked his supporters for $538,000 -- $1,000 for every vote he and Gore needed to win Florida's electoral votes in the 2000 election. His deadline was Dec. 12, the third anniversary of the Supreme Court's Bush v. Gore ruling.

Telethon-style fundraisers are nothing new, as anyone who has ever watched public television knows. But they have never been used so widely or so aggressively online by political campaigns. "What Howard Dean is doing is creating an urgent need on a routine basis," said Max Fose, the Internet campaign manager for McCain's presidential bid.

Campaign operatives and independent experts said the technique is a significant improvement over how candidates traditionally asked for money online. Typically, candidates urged supporters to visit their Web sites, read their e-mails and contribute sometime before the election.

The online "telethons," experts said, alter the incentives for contributing. The fundraisers' specific goals -- raising money to help air a television commercial, for example -- give donors a sense they are helping the campaigns in an immediate, tangible way.

"I think [donors] need to feel that there's a sense of ownership on their part and that they're not just being asked for money, but they're really being asked to be part of the campaign," said John Hlinko, an Internet strategist for the Clark campaign, which has also raised significant sums online. "That's really the key."

For the campaigns, the online fundraisers give them even more reasons to ask supporters for money, and those urgent deadlines make it more likely that donors will contribute sooner than later. "You don't want them to be thinking about it for a week," Hlinko said, "you want them to donate that day or the next day."

© 2003 The Washington Post Company



To: Lane3 who wrote (21441)12/25/2003 2:33:33 AM
From: LindyBill  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 793778
 
Homeland Security leaks like a sieve. I don't like that. And neither will Bush.

NBC5.com
Official: U.S. Hoped To Trap Terrorists Before Cancellations
Homeland Security Officials Frustrated News Of 'Security Concerns' Got Out

POSTED: 2:05 p.m. EST December 24, 2003
UPDATED: 6:02 p.m. EST December 24, 2003

PARIS -- The U.S. government had been hoping to snag some terrorists on flights between Paris and Los Angeles before the flights were canceled and news of security concerns was publicized, a U.S. official told The Associated Press on condition of anonymity.


The French government and Air France say six flights were canceled at the urging of the U.S. Embassy in Paris. U.S. and European officials said "credible" security threats prompted the cancellations.

The flights scheduled for Wednesday and Thursday were called off because of information obtained "in the framework of the French-American fight against terrorism," the French prime minister's office said.

The U.S. official cited by the AP said Washington had been hoping to keep the negotiations confidential, adding that the hope was "that we would be able to lure some of these people in."

There was some frustration in the Department of Homeland Security that the word got out about the security concerns, the official said.

A spokesman for the French prime minister's office said the decision to cancel the flights came after U.S. authorities alerted France that "two or three" suspicious people were planning to board the flights.

French television station LCI reported that U.S. authorities believed members of al-Qaida may have been planning to board the planes.

The airline is trying to arrange accommodations for the passengers whose flights were called off. They include three flights from Paris to Los Angeles, and three return flights.

Transportation Security Administration spokesman Brian Doyle said the U.S. Department of Homeland Security has been meeting with officials from the French government in recent days over concerns about a possible terrorist attack.

Doyle said Homeland Security Secretary Tom Ridge has personally been involved in the briefings with the French officials, as well as officials from other nations. Doyle declined to name other countries that had been contacted.

News of the security concern comes three days after the U.S. government, citing increased "chatter" heard while monitoring terrorists, raised the nation's terrorist-attack warning level to it's second-highest stage, orange, for "high" alert.

Ridge said Monday that intelligence information indicates al-Qaida is seeking again to use planes as weapons as they did on Sept. 11, 2001. Ridge said terrorists are constantly evaluating procedures to find holes in security.

Ridge said information indicates that "extremists abroad" are anticipating "near-term attacks" that they believe will "rival or exceed" those experienced in New York, Washington and Pennsylvania on Sept. 11, 2001.

A law enforcement official who asked to remain anonymous told The Associated Press earlier this week that some intercepted communications and other intelligence mentions New York, Washington and unspecified cities on the West Coast.
Copyright 2003 by . The Associated Press contributed to this report. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.



To: Lane3 who wrote (21441)12/25/2003 6:54:33 AM
From: LindyBill  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 793778
 
This reminds me of the start of AIDS. Nobody wants to spend the bucks at the start. Looks like "mad cow" has always been around.

December 25, 2003
Expert Warned That Mad Cow Was Imminent
By SANDRA BLAKESLEE - New York Times

ver since he identified the bizarre brain-destroying proteins that cause mad cow disease, Dr. Stanley Prusiner, a neurologist at the University of California at San Francisco, has worried about whether the meat supply in America is safe.

He spoke over the years of the need to increase testing and safety measures. Then in May, a case of mad cow disease appeared in Canada, and he quickly sought a meeting with Ann M. Veneman, the secretary of agriculture. He was rebuffed, he said in an interview yesterday, until he ran into Karl Rove, senior adviser to President Bush.

So six weeks ago, Dr. Prusiner, who won the 1997 Nobel Prize in Medicine for his work on prions, entered Ms. Veneman's office with a message. "I went to tell her that what happened in Canada was going to happen in the United States," Dr. Prusiner said. "I told her it was just a matter of time."

The department had been willfully blind to the threat, he said. The only reason mad cow disease had not been found here, he said, is that the department's animal inspection agency was testing too few animals. Once more cows are tested, he added, "we'll be able to understand the magnitude of our problem."

This nation should immediately start testing every cow that shows signs of illness and eventually every single cow upon slaughter, he said he told Ms. Veneman. Japan has such a program and is finding the disease in young asymptomatic animals.

Fast, accurate and inexpensive tests are available, Dr. Prusiner said, including one that he has patented through his university.

Ms. Veneman's response (he said she did not share his sense of urgency) left him frustrated. That frustration soared this week after a cow in Washington State was tentatively found to have the disease. If the nation had increased testing and inspections, meat from that cow might never have entered the food chain, he said.

Ms. Veneman was not available for interviews yesterday, and the White House referred all questions to the department. A spokeswoman for Ms. Veneman, Julie Quick, said: "We have met with many experts in this area, including Dr. Prusiner. We welcome as much scientific input and insight as we can get on this very important issue. We want to make sure that our actions are based on the best available science."

In Dr. Prusiner's view, Ms. Veneman is getting poor scientific advice. "U.S.D.A. scientists and veterinarians, who grew up learning about viruses, have difficulty comprehending the novel concepts of prion biology," he said. "They treat the disease as if it were an infection that you can contain by quarantining animals on farms. It's as though my work of the last 20 years did not exist."

Scientists have long been fascinated by a group of diseases, called spongiform encephalopathies, that eat away at the brain, causing madness and death. The leading theory was that they were caused by a slow-acting virus. But in 1988, Dr. Prusiner proposed a theory that seemed heretical at the time: the infectious agent was simply a type of protein, which he called prions.

Prions (pronounced PREE-ons), he and others went on to establish, are proteins that as a matter of course can misfold — that is, fold themselves into alternative shapes that have lethal properties — and cause a runaway reaction in nervous tissue. As more misfolded proteins accumulate, they kill nerve cells.

Animals that eat infected tissues can contract the disease, setting off an epidemic as animals eat each other via rendered meats. But misfolded proteins can also arise spontaneously in cattle and other animals, Dr. Prusiner said. It is not known whether meat from animals with that form of the disease could pass the disease to humans, he said, but it is a risk that greatly worries him.

Cattle with sporadic disease are probably entering the food chain in the United States in small numbers, Dr. Prusiner and other experts say.

Brain tissue from the newly discovered dairy cow in Washington is now being tested in Britain to see if it matches prion strains that caused the mad cow epidemic there, or if it is a homegrown American sporadic strain, Dr. Prusiner said.

"The problem is we just don't know the size of the problem," he said. "We don't know the prevalence or incidence of the disease."

The Japanese experience is instructive, Dr. Prusiner said. Three and a half years ago, that country identified its first case of mad cow disease. The government then said it would begin testing all cows older than 30 months, as they do in Europe. Older animals presumably have a greater chance of showing the disease, Dr. Prusiner said.

Japanese consumer groups protested and the government then said it would test every cow upon slaughter, Dr. Prusiner said. The Japanese have 4 million cattle and slaughter 1.2 million of them each year. The United States has 100 million cattle and kills 35 million a year.

Early this fall, Japanese surveillance found two new cases of the disease in young animals, aged 21 and 23 months. "Under no testing regime except Japan would these cases ever be found," he said.

The 23-month-old cow tested borderline positive using two traditional tests. But the surveillance team then looked in a different part of the brain using an advanced research technique and found a huge signal for infectious material, Dr. Prusiner said. It was a different strain of the disease, possibly a sporadic case.

The only way to learn what the United States is facing is to test every animal, Dr. Prusiner said. Existing methods, used widely in Europe and Japan, grind up brain stem tissue and use an enzyme to measure amounts of infectious prions. Animals must have lots of bad prions to get a clear diagnosis.

Newer tests, by a variety of companies, are more sensitive, cheaper and faster. Dr. Prusiner said that his test could even detect extremely small amounts of infectious prion in very young animals with no symptoms. Sold by InPro Biotechnology in South San Francisco, a single testing operation could process 8,000 samples in 24 hours, he said.

British health officials will start using the test in February, Dr. Prusiner said. If adopted in this country, it would raise the price of a pound of meat by two to three cents, he said.

"We want to keep prions out of the mouths of humans," Dr. Prusiner said. "We don't know what they might be doing to us."

His laboratory is working on promising treatments for the human form of mad cow disease but preventing its spread is just as important, he said. "Science is capable of finding out how serious the problem is," he said, "but only government can mandate the solutions."

Copyright 2003 The New York Times Company