Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bush-The Mastermind behind 9/11? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Don Earl who wrote (4860)	1/1/2004 6:01:11 PM
From: Raymond Duray	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 20039

LINKS TO WEBSITES OF SURVIVORS AND WITNESSES Don, You are right about a dearth of sites devoted to eye witness accounts of the attacks and the collapses of the WTC and the Pentagon. Here's a couple sites that survivors have put together: familiesofseptember11.org peacefultomorrows.org

To: Don Earl who wrote (4860)	1/1/2004 7:38:17 PM
From: twmoore	Respond to of 20039

People,possibly firefighters that were on the ground floor and escaped just before the buildings collapsed,would probably know best if they heard any explosions.I have some experiance in construction and it still behooves me that the one tower which experienced a glancing blow,with a lot of the plane fuel igniting down the side of the building,that the top of that building didn't collapse sideways towards the point of impact.For that matter,both buildings should have collapsed in that matter. On another note,I have never seen any interviews of the relatives or families of the passengers or pilots of the planes.It would be interesting to know if they think that there might have been some complicity on the part of the Bush cartel.

To: Don Earl who wrote (4860)	1/1/2004 8:12:29 PM
From: MSI	Respond to of 20039

Now that you mention it, I don't recall seeing anything much in the way of eye witnesses talking on message boards about what they saw. Precisely ... the media coverage format is to set the stage with carefully selected assumptions, then give us our opinions, then follow-up with various yes-men and yes-women confirm that opinion. All in the name of being "fair and balanced". Opponents like Michael Ruppert are avoided like the plague. The question to ask ourselves about media coverage by Fox and others is: How are they different from State Media?