Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Ask God -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Jamey who wrote (36208)	1/9/2004 6:45:37 PM
From: Sidney Reilly	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 39621

That's another interesting analogy of 666 although I don't agree that Nero was "the" man 666. He was not the anti-christ either. The beast was not involved. There are many flaws.. The Revelation of John was written after 70 AD and the events you are talking about were already history by then. Why would God give a revelation to a prophet that was partially history? He wouldn't. I've posted before about the reasons the events of 70 AD could not be the second coming. They were ignored and dismissed so I won't repost them.