Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : The Video Vault -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: SI Bob who wrote (476)	1/6/2004 4:06:49 PM
From: Oral Roberts	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 14270

Ahh what a breath of fresh air. Thank you. Anyhow, CNN is not likely to do a Andrew Dice Clay interview without some time delays and guys on the beep button:) rock103.com Caution: Strong Dice Clay kind of language

To: SI Bob who wrote (476)	1/6/2004 5:38:01 PM
From: Ken Adams	Respond to of 14270

Thank you SI Bob! You da' man!!

To: SI Bob who wrote (476)	1/6/2004 6:29:20 PM
From: The Philosopher	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 14270

When you come back in 30 days, I think you mistyped. The word you wanted was not days, but decades. Please correct the error.

To: SI Bob who wrote (476)	1/9/2004 5:19:30 PM
From: tonto	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 14270

He will hold you in contempt...(s) Everyone is wrong but Ray...

To: SI Bob who wrote (476)	1/11/2004 12:41:58 PM
From: Lazarus_Long	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 14270

Thanks, Bob. Not the first time that's happened, but the first time something was done about it.

To: SI Bob who wrote (476)	1/24/2004 4:36:45 AM
From: Don Earl	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 14270

<<<On second thought, I just reviewed some of your recent posts and you're not only spamming a bunch of hate and vulgarity, you're doing it in threads where it couldn't be any further off-topic.>>> I've been a member of SI since 1997 and this is the first time I've ever heard of anyone getting kicked off for being off topic. As far as vulgarity and hate are concerned, it's rather interesting that the uncalled for posts against Ray are okay, but when Ray responds, it's a violation. The last time I looked, ad hominem attacks are against the TOS, but for some reason it's only enforceable under certain circumstances. I've seen death threats and some of the most obscene posts imaginable removed after numerous complaints, but the persons responsible for the posts never seem to be reprimanded. So perhaps you have an attitude about Ray's politics. Perhaps the reason is you haven't done the kind of relentless research Ray has done and your opinion is uninformed to a degree you have no way to even comprehend what he's talking about. Considering the thickness of skin the average SI member is expected to grow in order to participate on SI most days, you strike me as rather sensitive when the shoe is on your own foot. If you disagree with opinions other that your own to a degree you'd rather not read a certain person's posts, why not use the ignore feature like everyone else? Ray is very well respected by many members of SI, including myself. Why is it that personal attacks directed at Ray are fine and dandy as far as SI is concerned, but if he responds in kind, it's a violation? You're wrong. Does that get me kicked off also? It wouldn't make you right, but it might give you another chance to show everyone just how wrong you are.