SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: E who wrote (24058)1/12/2004 7:11:21 PM
From: Ish  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 793671
 
<<What did you think of the last research I did for you? On the "What difference does it make?" and mushroom cloud references? You didn't even say thank you!>>

E, you and I don't agree about invading Iraq, seemed a long term good deal to me. And hell, I raise corn and I'm not a member of the "PNAC", whatever that is.

But lets get on to my point which I agree with you. You bring up a point and get a duh. Duh? You have a computer, go to google and have a lookie for yourself. Now provide a URL I can see but in general cases the person has a computer and is on the web and can Google. Or should lose his or her computer.



To: E who wrote (24058)1/12/2004 7:36:06 PM
From: Sully-  Respond to of 793671
 
I see you are doing the same thing to me that you did to
LB. You made an assertion I took issue with. You've
avoided answering the question & posed one of your own.

I'm not playing that game. When you answer mine, I'll be
glad to respond to one of your questions.

"facing the "world war," knowing that our intelligence
apparatus gave us completely bogus information about WMD
capacity in Iraq."

I disagree with that assertion.

I'd like to see you state a few specific instances of what
you perceive to be "completely bogus information about WMD
capacity in Iraq". Could you cull a few from the
following for me?

Message 19683333