SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Stockman Scott's Political Debate Porch -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: lurqer who wrote (34872)1/12/2004 8:14:14 PM
From: sylvester80  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 89467
 
Based on O'Neill's revelations, Blair should either resign or his party should oust him. No credibility left.

And for our Mr. Bush, Clinton was impeached because he lied about something that was not even a matter of state. This lying corrupt criminal POS Bush has lied and deceived the American people, the American congress and has murdered countless American and innocent lives by using his position to enrich his and Cheney's cronies. If that is not an impeachable offence I don't know what is.

IMPEACH BUSH NOW!!!!



To: lurqer who wrote (34872)1/12/2004 8:53:19 PM
From: elpolvo  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 89467
 
Revelation: "Bill Clinton Started It, We Finished It, And Mexico Approves"

the latest spin... read it and weep...

story.news.yahoo.com

Bush, Fox Agree on Immigration, Iraq

By SCOTT LINDLAW, Associated Press Writer

MONTERREY, Mexico - President Bush (news - web sites) and Mexican President Vicente Fox (news - web sites) found agreement Monday on the contentious issues of immigration and Iraq (news - web sites), ending two years of discord that followed the terrorist attacks of Sept. 11, 2001.

Fox wholeheartedly embraced Bush's immigration proposal to grant legal status to millions of undocumented workers in the United States, most of them from Mexico. "What else can we wish?" Fox said at a news conference with Bush.

The two leaders met before the opening of a 34-nation hemispheric summit dealing with issues such as poverty, trade, corruption and unhappiness in Latin America about new U.S. security measures to combat terrorism.

In the news conference, Bush dismissed suggestions that his new immigration proposal was an election-year gambit to attract Hispanic voters in America.

"It recognizes the reality of our country," Bush said of his plan. "The truth is, the vast majority of foreign workers in America are from Mexico."

However, Bush predicted, "There will be politics probably involved in whether or not it passes Congress."

Fox gave the proposal his cautious support last week, though Thursday, speaking at a school in Mexico City, Fox suggested it fell short. "We're going for more," he said.

But Monday, with the American president at his side, Fox expressed no reservations.

"This is a very important step forward," Fox said.

And Fox said his government was firmly in charge of security at Mexican airports where flights depart for the United States.

Mexican officials recently complained that Washington was pushing for cancellation of airline flights without providing hard evidence of security threats.

Governments from Mexico to Brazil have cried foul over U.S. measures to photograph and fingerprint visiting foreigners and to cancel airline flights over what some call dubious evidence of possible attacks.

"In reference to safety matters on the airports and the flights, that is a sovereign decision in Mexico," Fox said. "There is no intervention in the direct operation of any other official agent from abroad."

Bush also had a brief but friendly meeting with Chilean President Ricardo Lagos. Bush applauded the signing last year of a free-trade pact between the United States and Chile; Lagos told the Chilean news media that Bush's "Spanish is improving very much."

At a ceremony formally opening the summit Monday evening, Bush called on his fellow leaders to "stand with the brave people of Cuba, who for nearly a half-century have endured tyranny and repression."

"Dictatorship has no place in the Americas," Bush said. "We must all work for a rapid, peaceful transition to democracy in Cuba."

But the spotlight here was on Bush and his host, and the two leaders sought to project unity after two rocky years.



The Sept. 11 attacks distracted Bush from the immigration overhaul that Fox had appealed for, and relations cooled further when Mexico refused to support the U.S.-led invasion of Iraq.

In August 2002, Fox canceled a visit to Bush's ranch to protest the Texas execution of police killer Javier Suarez Medina.

In a gesture of reconciliation, Bush re-invited Fox to his Texas ranch March 5-6, and Fox accepted.

They sought to emphasize agreement on postwar Iraq, too. Fox congratulated Bush for the capture of Saddam Hussein (news - web sites) by American forces. "He will be taken to trial, to judgment. We fully support that," the Mexican president said.

Bush offered a forceful defense of the war, despite U.S. casualty totals approaching 500. "The decision I made is the right one for America. And history will provide it is the right one for the world," he said.

On another issue, Bush declined to criticize former Treasury Secretary Paul O'Neill, whose new book says the administration aimed to topple the Iraqi government even before the Sept. 11 attacks.

"First, let me say I appreciate former Secretary O'Neill's service to our country," Bush said. Bush recalled grappling with a series of challenges during O'Neill's two-year tenure, including the terror attacks and the recession.

Bush said that when he became president, he inherited a policy of "regime change" from former President Clinton (news - web sites) and adopted it as his own. "So we were fashioning policy along those lines and then all of a sudden Sept. 11 hit," he said.

The trip was Bush's fourth to Mexico since he took office nearly three years ago, more than to any other country. He brought his wife, Laura, and daughter Jenna on the trip, and they sat just in front of him during his news conference with Fox.

Monterrey is a city of heavy industry, and the family's motorcade passed warehouses and factories bearing such familiar names as Whirlpool and Nextel, as well as other reminders that this city is just 2 1/2 hours from the U.S. border. The news conference was held across the street from a JC Penney store.

Men digging ditches alongside the road stopped and leaned on their tools to watch his entourage pass by, and one man and his young child waved American flags.

*************************************

i guess that settles it once and for all, eh?
why we invaded iraq, how it saved the world,
and how indebted one man and his young child
in monterrey, mexico are to us.

-elpolvo



To: lurqer who wrote (34872)1/12/2004 10:31:19 PM
From: Mannie  Read Replies (5) | Respond to of 89467
 
Scary..

Monday, January 12, 2004

Pacific Currents: Overuse of antibiotics in China raises
alarm

By JULIE CHAO
COX NEWS SERVICE

BEIJING -- Whenever Ye Zhiming feels a cold coming on and gets that scratchy feeling in his
throat, he goes to a drugstore and buys some antibiotics.

"I used to go to the doctor for a prescription," said Ye, a 37-year-old office clerk. "Now I just buy
it myself. I know what works for me."

It costs him about 60 cents for a box of 24 spiramycin capsules.

Buying any of a range of powerful antibiotics in China is as easy as buying aspirin. Not that a
doctor would have refused him a prescription. As many as 90 percent of people who visit a hospital
in China are given an antibiotic.

The overuse of antibiotics has resulted is a new generation of drug-resistant "supergerms" in the
world's most populous country.

Drug resistance has become an urgent problem in many countries, but the danger has arisen
especially quickly in China, where rapid improvements in living standards have allowed more
people access to better health care. Resistance rates that took the United States decades to reach have
been surpassed by China in just 10 years.

Germ-killing antibiotics have saved millions of lives worldwide in the past half-century. But
because antibiotics have been widely misused and overused, the bacteria they were meant to kill are
able to mutate.

The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention has called it one of the most pressing global
health problems. With some pathogens becoming more virulent than ever, doctors are running out
of drugs to treat them.

In China, growing global ties mean that public-health problems are no longer just domestic
problems. "The faster we internationalize, the faster the germs will spread," said Xiao Yonghong,
deputy director of the Institute of Clinical Pharmacology at Peking University.

Xiao said the levels of resistance are
alarming. In the United States, 6
percent of cases of infection by E.
coli are resistant to Ciproflaxacin,
recently best known as the antibiotic
used to fight anthrax, but in China,
70 percent of the cases are resistant
to the drug.

Resistance of MRSA, the
Staphylococcus bacteria that is the
main cause of hospital infections, is
also 70 percent, twice the U.S. rate.
Gonorrhea in China is 85 percent
resistant to penicillin, more than
four times the level in Australia.

Tuberculosis had previously been
under control in China, but its
growing resistance to multidrug
treatment is the main reason for the
recent increase of the disease, Xiao
said. "In America, it's simple to get a gun, but at least you need a doctor's prescription to get an
antibiotic," said Xiao, an expert on drug-resistant infections.

The government has issued no guidelines on antibiotic use and no specific policies for combating
drug resistance, Xiao said. Yet the outbreak of SARS last year has heightened awareness.

Aware of the widespread abuse, government authorities have announced that a prescription will be
required starting in July. The media have also started running stories about the issue.

Experts wonder whether the new requirement can be implemented because, in fact, a doctor's
prescription is already required for antibiotics and has been for years. But the law is virtually never
enforced.

Zhang Aiqin, head pharmacist at Beijing's Anzhen Hospital, said the rule won't work in China with
its lax regulations of prescriptions and vast population. "How will each drugstore identify which
doctor and which hospital wrote the prescription?" she said. "It can't be done in China."

Even if prescriptions could be verified, it would not control the ways in which doctors prescribe
antibiotics. "Doctors say they're rushed and don't have time or they just want to be sure or patients
demand them," Zhang said. "They have all sorts of excuses, but in a word, it's just reckless."

Hospitals rely on selling drugs for the bulk of their revenue. Often, doctors even get commissions
from drug companies. Outpatients pay less than $1 to see a doctor, maybe $2 for a specialist, but
might spend $30 or more on drugs. For inpatients, half their hospital bill could be for antibiotics,
according to the Beijing Daily.

"They always ask if we have medical coverage or if we're paying ourselves," Ye said. "If we have
cov- erage, they always prescribe more drugs and more expensive drugs."