Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (523891)	1/14/2004 11:51:10 AM
From: Kenneth E. Phillipps	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769667

Inside The Bush White House "Its an amazing moment," said one senior White House official...."Karl just went from prime minister to king. Amazing . . . and a little scary. Now no one will speak candidly about him or take him on or contradict him. Pure power, no real accountability. Its just listen to Karl and everything will work out.. . . That may go for the president, too." ..."many of us feel its our dutyour obligation as Americansto get the word out that, certainly in domestic policy, there has been almost no meaningful consideration of any real issues. Its just kids on Big Wheels who talk politics and know nothing. Its depressing. Domestic Policy Council meetings are a farce. This leaves shoot-from-the-hip political calculationsmostly from Karls shopto triumph by default. No one balances Karl. Forget it." "There is no precedent in any modern White House for what is going on in this one: a complete lack of a policy apparatus," says [former head of Bush faith-based programs, John] DiIulio. "What youve got is everythingand I mean everythingbeing run by the political arm. Its the reign of the Mayberry Machiavellis." --3 quotes from essay by Ron Suskind, Jan. '03

To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (523891)	1/14/2004 11:56:43 AM
From: jlallen	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769667

Unfortunately, it appears O'Neill's book contains substantial misstatements calling into question his honesty...

To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (523891)	1/14/2004 11:56:55 AM
From: Kenneth E. Phillipps	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769667

Rubin warns of a deficit's ripples Ex-Treasury sec'y urges fiscal responsibility Former Treasury Secretary Robert Rubin is concerned about what he calls a loss of fiscal discipline in Washington. By Martin Wolk MSNBC Updated: 5:23 p.m. ET Jan. 13, 2004As one former Treasury secretary made waves Tuesday with his critical account of life in the Bush administration, another warned of a potentially disastrous financial crisis brought on by rising federal budget deficits. Robert Rubin, Treasury secretary under President Clinton, warned of a “very substantial” risk that continued high budget deficits could bring on a cascading series of economic and political problems including rising interest rates, a falling stock market and a sharp decline in the value of the dollar. Rubin, currently a top executive and director at Citigroup, said the fundamental problem is that financial markets and investors, particularly foreign investors, will lose confidence in the ability of the U.S. political system to control the deficit and will demand higher interest rates to compensate for the rising risk of inflation. “While there is no way to quantify this risk, I think they are levels of increase that could be very substantial and could have a severe impact on the economy,” Rubin said in a conference call with reporters sponsored by the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities. The CBPP is a liberal group, but Rubin’s call for fiscal restraint has been embraced by more conservative groups as well, including the business-based Committee for Economic Development and the bipartisan Concord Coalition. Ironically Rubin’s concerns also were shared by the former Treasury secretary of the moment, Paul O’Neill, who has dominated headlines in recent days with his assertions that President Bush was disengaged on economic policy and began planning for an invasion of Iraq shortly after assuming office. While the Bush administration has launched an investigation into O’Neill’s possible misuse of classified documents on Iraq, it may have been O’Neill’s concern about rising budget deficits that ultimately got him fired in late 2002, according to “The Price of Loyalty,” an account of his tenure in Bush’s Cabinet published Tuesday. In a November 2002 meeting, O’Neill warned Vice President Dick Cheney of a potential “fiscal crisis” brought on by soaring budget deficits, according to an excerpt of the book published in The Wall Street Journal. “Reagan proved deficits don’t matter,” Cheney retorted, making clear that the administration, flush with victory in the midterm elections, intended to forge ahead with plans for another major tax-cut package. Former Treasury Secretary Paul O'Neill brushes aside accusations that he provided classified documents for a new book about his role in the Bush administration. Author Ron Suskind joined the conversation with the "Today" show's Katie Couric. Today show O’Neill, who opposed the $350 billion tax-cut package, was left “speechless,” according to the book, and soon was jobless as well. In a talk-show appearance over the weekend, O’Neill’s successor, Treasury Secretary John Snow, reaffirmed the administration’s commitment to cut the deficit in half over the next five years. “This is an administration committed to fiscal responsibility,” Snow told ABC’s “This Week.” “This budget that comes forward will be one that advances the priorities of the country but within a fiscally responsible framework.” Tax cuts and an economic downturn helped fuel a record $374 billion budget gap last year, or about 3.5 percent of U.S. gross domestic product, the highest proportion since 1993. The White House expects that to hit about 4.2 percent this year before dropping to less than 2 percent of GDP in fiscal 2006, according to the White House Office of Management and Budget. The non-partisan Congressional Budget Office, in an analysis published in August, comes to a similar conclusion. But Rubin and others contend that such budget projections are based on wildly unrealistic assumptions. For example, White House and CBO projections presume that Congress will allow certain tax cuts to “sunset” as scheduled, although the Bush administration already has asked for extensions on some, and other extensions are considered likely as well. Similarly the CBO projection assumes Congress will not remedy a widely recognized problem with the alternative minimum tax, which is on track to ensnare tens of millions of middle-class taxpayers by the end of the decade. Nor do the latest CBO estimates account for the cost of the Medicare prescription drug benefit passed by Congress late last year.