SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: i-node who wrote (180712)1/16/2004 3:03:03 PM
From: Road Walker  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1572446
 
DR,

re: It is convenient to zero-in on some aspect of the economic picture you don't like and offer it as either a premise or a result; but these interactions are far too complex to allow logical conclusions based on such simplistic analyses.

I didn't present it as a premise or a result, just offered the data.

But otherwise, I agree with you. I think back to when I was a kid, my family used to drive cross country for vacations. There were no Holiday Inns, we stayed in motels owned by people; there were no McDonalds or Burger Kings, we ate in restaurants owned by people.

Through my career I worked with retailer categories that went from being primarily family owned businesses to being corporate category killers. Pharmacies (remember when there were a dozen family owned corner pharmacies in every town), now there is Walgreens. The hardware store industry was almost all family owned, now it's Home Depot and Lowes; Toy Stores, you name it, everything has gone from family owned to corporate owned. And as a result, a lot of folks have gone from being owners and employers to being workers and employees.

That's a multi-generational trend. You couple it with the weakness of labor unions over the last 15-20 years, and I think you have a good part of the explanation for the increase in income disparity.

Is it a Republican/conservative Democrat/liberal issue? Not the corpritizing of America; maybe the weakness of the unions. But I think the country was better off, in many ways, when family businesses flourished.

John



To: i-node who wrote (180712)1/16/2004 10:43:46 PM
From: tejek  Respond to of 1572446
 
However, it is difficult for me to understand how the Left constantly drones on about Clinton's "Great Economy" when the fundamental premise of the Left's economic agenda (wealth redistribution) appears to have failed during Clinton's tenure.

Its really above you.......I would suggest giving it up!