SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Bilow who wrote (123910)1/28/2004 5:13:58 PM
From: michael97123  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 281500
 
"Saddam repeatedly told the world that Iraq had no WMDs. He asked for inspectors to return, (without the CIA spies). When inspectors did return, they were given free run of the country. Logically, the only reasonable conclusion is that Saddam knew that there were no WMDs to find."

So why were inspector removed under clinton and why wasnt there any proof given for wmd destruction. The man let himself be destroyed when all he had to do was point the UN to the right places and the right documents. mike



To: Bilow who wrote (123910)1/28/2004 8:11:33 PM
From: Nadine Carroll  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 281500
 
The UN was going to authorize an invasion of Iraq if Saddam did not get rid of his WMDs. It's only logical to conclude that he would get rid of them.


...and the diabolically clever part of the plan was not to tell the UN about it or show the UN inspectors that he was getting rid of anything. I see. Saddam sure fooled them, didn't he?


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News