SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Noel de Leon who wrote (123980)1/29/2004 11:45:52 AM
From: Neocon  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 281500
 
I was not inconsistent, I showed that it was not inconsistent, and I got no apology. To note that we are in a poor position to judge independently the work that has been done by the intelligence services, not being privy to their sources and analyses, is not the same as not being able to express an opinion differing from that of a single official who himself expresses as speculative opinion a view on the possibility of finding WMD's. Furthermore, my disagreement was based on material he himself had brought to light about the possibility of shipments over the border, which came from interrogation and was verified in part by satellite photos and other means of surveillance.



To: Noel de Leon who wrote (123980)1/29/2004 12:27:35 PM
From: Nadine Carroll  Respond to of 281500
 
No Noel, I did not change the subject. I responded to your words exactly. If you didn't mean what you said because you were thinking of some other context, that's not my problem.



To: Noel de Leon who wrote (123980)1/29/2004 4:53:44 PM
From: Bilow  Respond to of 281500
 
Hi Noel de Leon; Re: "Bilow was pointing out that there are inconsistencies in Neocon's posts which can be explained if one accepts that Neocon has a hidden agenda."

His agenda is pretty open, if you ask me, LOL. It's not like he chose his nickname out of an intent to deceive.

-- Carl