SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: unclewest who wrote (27997)2/5/2004 6:16:50 AM
From: LindyBill  Respond to of 793936
 
Who woulda thunk it three months ago. "The Last Hurrah."

Dean Gears Up For a Last Stand In Wisconsin

By Jim VandeHei and Jonathan Finer
Washington Post Staff Writers
Thursday, February 5, 2004; Page A01

Howard Dean is pursuing a last-gasp strategy of winning the Feb. 17 Wisconsin primary, but many Democrats, aides and supporters are privately predicting the end to one of the wildest, most unpredictable and most innovative presidential campaigns of recent times.

On the first anniversary of the initial Internet "Meetup" for Dean supporters, which quickly grew into a revolutionary e-campaign and fundraising machine, the former Vermont governor is pleading with supporters to buy into the unorthodox strategy that he can lose 15 states in a row and still turn his campaign around.

"It's looking pretty dismal, isn't it?" said Rep. Loretta Sanchez (D-Calif.), a Dean backer.

"It's going to be extraordinarily difficult," said Rep. Neil Abercrombie (D-Hawaii), who stays in contact with the campaign. "Unless he wins and shortly, we have to face up to the fact" that a prolonged fight could undercut the larger goal of Dean supporters: beating President Bush. Both Abercrombie and Sanchez commended Dean for toughening the party and vowed to stick with him, at least through Wisconsin.

After spending more than $40 million with no victories to show, Dean failed to meet his own low expectations in the seven states that voted Tuesday. He had hoped to win New Mexico and mop up delegates in other states. Instead, he lost every state, won about half as many votes as retired Army Gen. Wesley K. Clark overall and limped away with seven delegates out of the 269 at stake.

The outlook for this weekend is not much brighter, supporters said, as the race heads to Michigan, where Sen. John F. Kerry (Mass.) is poised for a big win based on polls, and Washington.

Rep. Jim McDermott (Wash.), a key Dean supporter, said Dean looks like a "long shot" heading into his state's caucuses, which are dominated by the antiwar liberals the former Vermont governor so inspired early on. "It's getting harder and harder to see how" Dean bounces back without a win before Wisconsin, McDermott said, questioning the viability of the last-stand-in-Cheeseland plan.

Dean said yesterday that he does not expect to carry Michigan, "but I think we'll get some delegates there, and that's what I'm working hard at." He predicted, however, that he will win in Washington, recalling a speech he delivered in the state a year ago during which he questioned why Democrats backed Bush on the war in Iraq, education changes and tax cuts.

"I am still waiting for answers," Dean told an audience in a Seattle hotel ballroom. "The fabric of our society is being torn apart. These are not petty political differences to be papered over by gamesmanship in Washington, D.C. This is a fundamental disagreement about the very nature of what it means to be an American."

Dean is likely to hear the first calls for his withdrawal if his prediction is wrong, several Democrats said. "If he can't break through in Washington, then he has to hang it up," said former representative Tony Coelho (Calif.), chairman of Al Gore's 2000 campaign. "At that point, he won't have any credibility going forward." Coelho, who has not endorsed anyone, said Dean might put at risk his credibility and legacy if he wages a fight that he clearly cannot win.

Dean told reporters on his campaign plane yesterday that "nobody has called me" about withdrawing. But several supporters privately said they will soon approach Dean about dropping out if the weekend goes badly. Dean remained defiant, however, telling a Seattle TV station yesterday that "I'm not bowing out no matter what happens" on Saturday.

Dean has not aired a television ad since New Hampshire and is planning to spend few resources trying to win the other pre-Wisconsin contests, including Virginia and Tennessee on Tuesday.

Conversations among members of Dean's staff have shifted to what they will do after the campaign -- and the options do not involve working in the White House, campaign sources said. Some staffers have been let go in recent days, although those remaining are getting paid after a brief freeze on paychecks. And Dean is losing much of his media entourage: The Associated Press, Bloomberg, Fox News, CNN and others have reassigned their top Dean reporters to cover Kerry, Edwards or Clark.

"Everything looks pretty grim," said Elaine Karmack, a former Gore adviser who has stopped just short of endorsing Dean. "But it is feasible to stage a comeback." Karmack, a Harvard University professor, pointed to the 1980 Democratic race, when President Jimmy Carter jumped to a big early lead only to see Sen. Edward M. Kennedy (Mass.) mount a late -- and eventually unsuccessful -- comeback. But unlike 1980, this year's calendar is packed with early-voting states, which many Democrats believe complicates plans for any candidate banking on late breaks.

None of Dean's 37 congressional supporters has abandoned him, although Kerry's aides are lobbying many of them to join the front-running campaign. A few have privately warned they are about to leave Dean.

Rep. Zoe Lofgren (Calif.), a Dean backer, said the "volatility" of this year's race, combined with Dean's passionate following among younger voters, is keeping the campaign alive.

Dean appears to be holding on to the public backing of his two most powerful supporters: the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees and the Service Employees International Union.

Although several Democrats said officials of the two unions have privately talked of pulling the plug on Dean, SEIU President Andrew Stern said yesterday, "The members of SEIU continue to believe that Howard Dean is the right messenger." Dean talked by phone with leaders of the key unions supporting him and came away convinced they will stick with him through Wisconsin, a top aide said. "We're good to go through Wisconsin," Stern said in an interview.

If Dean loses the unions, "that would be fatal, that would be the end," said Steve Elmendorf, a Kerry adviser with close ties to labor.

Dean on Tuesday and yesterday continued his campaign to win Washington state, where only months ago he attracted a crowd in the thousands at a well-planned event. But on Tuesday, the crowd failed in several attempts to chant his name in unison, the microphone shifted in and out of echo mode, and the candidate sometimes stumbled over a speech he has given hundreds of times.

Dean has said he would not seek to damage the party, although he has shown no signs of tempering his criticism of Kerry and "Washington Democrats" in general. He also said he will not back down until a candidate has a majority of delegates, but several Democrats who have spoken with Dean said he is slowly coming to grips with the reality before him.

"I think that he would be missed, and I wouldn't want what he brought to the campaign to disappear," said Dean supporter Elizabeth Ready, Vermont's state auditor. "But on a personal level, I worry about how he's holding up. It's exhausting, it's thankless, and he's gotten really beaten up."

Finer reported from Seattle. Researcher Lucy Shackelford contributed to this report.

© 2004 The Washington Post Company



To: unclewest who wrote (27997)2/5/2004 6:25:13 AM
From: LindyBill  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 793936
 
Didja ever turn over a rock and watch the Roaches run? The dumping of Hip Hop and Rap at the Pro-Bowl here is good news.



Flags Keep Dropping on Super Bowl Stunt

By Lisa de Moraes

Washington Post

Like something in a B-horror flick, Janet Jackson's radioactive right breast has morphed into the monster that's eating Hollywood.

In the past 24 hours:

• Jackson's name was stricken from the official list of presenters for Sunday's Grammy Awards telecast on CBS. That's the same network that beamed us the Super Bowl game during which Jackson's breast made its broadcast TV debut in a stunt that duet partner Justin Timberlake called a "wardrobe malfunction." According to one source close to the production, CBS and the Recording Academy are waiting for her to graciously bow out; if she does not soon, they will uninvite her.

• ABC announced it will initiate a five-second delay on its live telecast of the Academy Awards so it can censor any "wardrobe malfunctions" or Bono-esque "[expletive] brilliant" moments.

• The NFL canceled this weekend's Pro Bowl halftime show starring Timberlake's fellow 'N Sync-er JC Chasez because it was afraid of his choice of songs -- "Blowing Me Up (With Her Love)" -- and the accompanying choreography. Chasez has been replaced with "Hawaiian-themed entertainment."

• NBC cut from tonight's "ER" episode a shot of an exposed breast of an 80-year-old woman receiving emergency care, even though the network says it thinks the shot is appropriate.

Before Jackson's Super Bowl appearance, she had been lined up to introduce a Grammy tribute to Luther Vandross, who is recovering from a stroke and who the Grammy producers hoped would be well enough to attend the ceremony.

Vandross is no longer expected to appear. Jackson isn't either, according to the source close to the production. Her name is missing from a news release issued earlier in the day by Grammy organizers that lists the show's celebrity hosts, presenters and performers.

Though she apologized for her Super Bowl performance via videotape -- aired by various syndicated celebrity-driven TV shows last night -- as of late yesterday she had not withdrawn as a Grammy presenter. CBS declined to comment. A Recording Academy rep also declined to comment.

Timberlake is still on the official Grammy list of hosts, presenters and performers.

Also yesterday, ABC notified the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences that it will, for the first time, use a five-second delay on its Oscar broadcast in order to be able to bleep out inappropriate language.

ABC actually approached the academy about the five-second delay before Jackson's Super Bowl halftime performance, according to academy Executive Director Bruce Davis.

"They've been getting some not-so-subtle FCC pressure, particularly about awards shows, based on the Bono incident a year ago and then the other incident this year at the Globes," he said.

He's referring to Bono's reaction, televised by NBC, to receiving a Golden Globe Award last year in which he said, "[expletive] brilliant." The FCC ruled that the adjective did not fit its definition of indecency. He's also referring to Diane Keaton's acceptance speech in which she employed a couple more words we can't print here.

"They were nervous long before the couple of things that happened just in the last few days," Davis said of ABC.

"Part of what they're worried about is that bill in Congress that would increase the financial penalties [for broadcasting an 'indecency'] tenfold; they're terrified of this. I can imagine the kind of pressure the network is feeling and it's all very well for us to take a noble First Amendment approach, but if this bill is passed and run through by February 29" -- the date of the Oscars -- "we might be exposing them to some horrendous amount of money . . . we have to recognize that."

The Academy Awards have never had a delay for censoring content. "It was just a feeling that the absolute liveness on both coasts was part of the appeal. And the slippery slope -- if you start to allow somebody else to have a little bit of control, where does it all end?" said Davis.

The academy board voted Tuesday night and decided by "a strong majority" not to oppose ABC if it implemented the delay. Asked why ABC was starting the five-second delay on the Oscarcast now, a network rep said, "It really is kind of 'Why not now?' It's the smart and responsible thing to do." She noted that ABC's policy has been to have a five-second delay on live entertainment events, except for the Academy Awards.

And, over at the NFL, they've gone into full "I'm shocked, shocked to find that gambling is going on at Rick's" mode, canceling boytoy Chasez's halftime performance at this weekend's Pro Bowl in Hawaii because they've discovered that his song "Blowing Me Up" is suggestive and that the choreography might also be suggestive.

"In light of what happened Sunday night with the Super Bowl halftime show we took a close look at what was planned for the Pro Bowl and decided to make a change," NFL spokesman Greg Aiello told The TV Column. Chasez's song "included some very suggestive lyrics and we didn't think it was appropriate in light of the current situation. So we decided to move the pre-game show to halftime."

And over at Warner Bros. Television, after receiving assurances of support from NBC entertainment and news president Jeff Zucker, producers of "ER" were surprised to learn yesterday that the breast-revealing scene would be cut. According to a source, NBC affiliates went over Zucker's head to complain that in view of the Jackson incident they believed that they would get a big fat indecency fine direct from Washington if they aired a split-second corner shot during a 10 p.m. medical drama in which an 80-year-old woman's shirt is ripped off so doctors can give her emergency treatment.

"In consultation with our Affiliate Board we have asked 'ER' to remove [the] shot," the General Electric division said in a statement. "Though we continue to believe the shot is appropriate and in context, and would have aired after 10:30 p.m. Eastern and Pacific time, we have unfortunately concluded that the atmosphere created by this week's events has made it too difficult for many of our affiliates to air this."

"ER" executive producer John Wells responded angrily in a statement: "While the unexpected exposure of Ms. Jackson's breast during the Super Bowl Half-Time Show was inappropriate and deplorable on a broadcast intended for viewers of all ages, 'ER's' incidental exposure of an elderly woman's breast in the context of a medical trauma is not comparable."

Wells told The TV Column he thinks that the shot "lends that sense of seeing someone who is vulnerable in a way that is important to the overall narrative of the piece -- their loneliness, dislocation and loss of privacy."

In his statement, he noted that "adult viewing audiences at 10 p.m., who have been warned appropriately of a show's adult content, are more than capable of making the distinction and adjusting their viewing habits accordingly. These types of affiliate overreactions have a chilling effect on the narrative integrity of adult dramas."

Asked whether he would at least get a good episode of his fantasy White House drama "The West Wing" out of this headache, Wells laughed and responded: "I think you should assume this will come up soon in some of the other shows we are involved with."

In a parting shot, he noted that "this type of network behavior is one of the primary reasons that so many of today's producers and viewers are increasingly turning to HBO and other cable outlets that do not censor responsible story telling."

ESPN has canceled its first scripted series, "Playmakers," and the show's creator says it was the NFL's doing.

The cable sports network announced yesterday that the drama series about a pro football team, which the NFL blasted for its sometimes unflattering portrayal of players, will not return for a second season despite record ratings for ESPN.

"Many considerations went into this decision, not the least of which was the reaction from a longtime and valued partner," ESPN executive Mark Shapiro said in a statement. He was referring to the NFL, with which ESPN has a $4.8 billion contract to televise its Sunday night games.

Shapiro told The Post's John Maynard yesterday that the final decision was solely ESPN's. The NFL "did not put a gun to our head," he said.

The NFL in a statement said the cancellation "was an ESPN decision and now we can all move on."

But "Playmakers" creator and executive producer John Eisendrath said: "The NFL canceled the show. Implicitly or explicitly, [the NFL] let it be known that the future of football on ESPN and [corporate parent] ABC hinged on the decision that they made about 'Playmakers,' " he told Maynard.

"This is an example of censorship. There is no way to sugarcoat it."

The series, which premiered in August, averaged 2 million viewers a week, a 300 percent increase from ESPN's average in the same time slot the previous year.

© 2004 The Washington Post Company



To: unclewest who wrote (27997)2/5/2004 7:00:38 AM
From: LindyBill  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 793936
 
Looks like we hear more and more on this subject. Best recap I have read.

No "There There" To The Bush AWOL Charge
The whole "Bush was AWOL" meme that the media and the Democrats are pushing right now is the biggest sack of nothing since the Enron "scandal". It's a tempest a teapot that had no real impact 2000 and that no one is going to care about in November of 2004. Especially since there is absolutely no "there there".

Let me give you a rundown of Bush's time in the Guard. In 1968, Bush joined the National Guard after scoring in the, "25th percentile as a pilot (qualifying, but just barely), in the 50th percentile as a navigator (promising material), and in the 95th percentile as an officer (outstanding)."

Bush wasn't just a weekend warrior back then either,

"(From 1968-1972) Bush served the equivalent of 21 months on active duty, according to the Globe account, including more than a year of flight training. The Globe quoted Bush’s flight instructor, retired Col. Maurice H. Udell, as saying "I would rank him in the top 5 percent of pilots I knew.”

Then in 1972, Bush went to Alabama to work on a Senate campaign and was to fulfill his National Guard duties, albeit not as a pilot, there. But, from May of 1972 to May of 1973, some people are claiming that the military has no record of George Bush reporting for duty. Moreover, officer William Turnipseed, who Bush was supposed to report to, has no recollection of ever talking to Bush during that period. This is where the fictitious AWOL charge comes from.

However, as the Boston Globe originally reported when they broke this story, the military itself said in 1973 of Bush's "missing time", "report for this period not available for administrative reasons". So, they're in effect saying that they lost the paperwork. Moreover, Turnipseed recently reported to the WAPO that, "he could not recall if he, himself, was on the base much at that time". On top of that, here's the coup de grace that was originally reported by the New York Times way back on Nov 3, 2003...

"Mr. Bartlett pointed to a document in Mr. Bush's military records that showed credit for four days of duty ending Nov. 29 and for eight days ending Dec. 14, 1972, and, after he moved back to Houston, on dates in January, April and May. The May dates correlated with orders sent to Mr. Bush at his Houston apartment on April 23, 1973, in which Sgt. Billy B. Lamar told Mr. Bush to report for active duty on May 1-3 and May 8-10."

I want to sum all of this up for those who may be confused or alternately in the case of people like Max Cleland, Michael Moore, and Terry Mcauliffe, are lying through their teeth. George Bush served during that "missing year", the military never categorized George Bush as a "deserter" or "AWOL", and Bush was given an honorable discharge after putting in some more time in 1973. So there is absolutely no substance, none, to charges that George Bush was ever "AWOL" from the National Guard. Therefore anyone who claims there is must either be ignorant of the all the facts that have been brought to light, a liar, or some combination thereof.
rightwingnews.com



To: unclewest who wrote (27997)2/6/2004 5:21:10 AM
From: LindyBill  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 793936
 
On the Light Side: Why Admirals Speak English

By Anonymous



An officer in the U.S. Naval reserve was attending a conference that included admirals from both the U.S. Navy and the French Navy.



At a cocktail reception, he found himself in a small group that included personnel from both navies. The French admiral started complaining that whereas Europeans learned many languages, Americans learned only English. He then asked:



“Why is it that we have to speak English in these conferences rather than you speak French?”



Without hesitating, the American admiral replied: “Maybe it’s because the Brits, Canadians, Aussies and Americans arranged it so you would not have to speak in German.”



The group became silent.