Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Biotech / Medical : Biotech Valuation -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: A.J. Mullen who wrote (10302)	2/5/2004 5:49:31 PM
From: Biomaven	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 52153

OK - let's go with the PM version then. I can use my trusty Clipmate to join all the posts together, so it shouldn't be too hard for me. Peter

To: A.J. Mullen who wrote (10302)	2/5/2004 6:42:39 PM
From: software salesperson	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 52153

ashley, i was merely posting the explanation of the condorcet statistical proof. i don't believe that the millionaire game is a good example in the context of the author's argument and, i agree with you, it does not have much relevance here. i was responding to peter's request. on the other hand, if we could find 1000 dispassionate, scientifically knowledgeable, financially astute, analytically rigorous people, then i believe condorcet's statistics would be relevant. or failing that goal, i wonder what the statistics would tell us about having a group of 50 people who, rather than being 51% right, were 60% right. sales