SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: greenspirit who wrote (28463)2/8/2004 5:38:42 PM
From: michael97123  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 793963
 
Michael,
Respectfully disagree on both. A balanced budget amendment would have hamstrung our efforts to restart the economy but more importantly it would have destroyed efforts to fund the war on terror in a time of severe recession.
Term limits remove men and women but do not address the real issue which is that 95% of House seats are owned by one party or the other. I have no solution but i suspect that term limits would lose us folks with valuable skills without gain us much in return. Mike



To: greenspirit who wrote (28463)2/8/2004 5:38:42 PM
From: michael97123  Respond to of 793963
 
delete dupe



To: greenspirit who wrote (28463)2/9/2004 10:07:50 AM
From: Jack Hartmann  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 793963
 
I remember when Reagan campaigned for a line item veto to eliminate pork. I don't hear much about that anymore.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News