SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Don't Blame Me, I Voted For Kerry -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: American Spirit who wrote (1372)2/10/2004 8:18:19 AM
From: stockman_scottRead Replies (2) | Respond to of 81568
 
Kerry's 'Southern strategy' spurs worry
_______________________

Loyalists cheer rare appearance in Tennessee

By Jeff Zeleny and Kirsten Scharnberg, Tribune national correspondents. Tribune national correspondent Kirsten Scharnberg reported from Morrison, Tenn

February 10, 2004

The Chicago Tribune

MEMPHIS -- The Democratic voters of Tennessee have seen Sen. John Kerry again and again in his television commercials. But he has paid far less personal attention to a state even his rivals concede he is likely to win, logging only two visits before Tuesday's primary.

Ever since the senator from Massachusetts said last month that "everybody makes the mistake of looking South," many voters and Democratic leaders across the region have wondered whether he was telegraphing his intention to steer his presidential campaign away from Southern states. Those worries intensified when Kerry declined to appear at a weekend "Presidential Primary Celebration" in Nashville with the other two leading candidates.

So as Kerry arrived in Memphis on Monday evening for a downtown rally on the eve of the election, loyal Democrats applauded excitedly when they caught a glimpse of the front-runner. They hoped, though, that it wouldn't be the last time he turned up below the Mason-Dixon Line.

"There should be a Southern strategy in a national campaign for a Democratic candidate," said Tennessee party Chairman Randy Button, who thought Kerry's decision to skip the weekend forum was "a mistake." "If you're looking at November, there are going to be some Southern battleground states. Tennessee is one of them."

After winning 10 states, and with polls indicating he is leading in Tuesday's contests in Tennessee and in Virginia, Kerry may all but cinch his fight for the party's nomination. But some Democratic strategists say he also may have passed up a chance to begin presenting himself as a candidate in whom the voters could feel an investment for the fall campaign.

Indeed, when the nominee emerges to challenge Bush, each candidate faces a country with a narrow political divide. While each of the last three Democratic presidents have come from the South, the region was far less kind to its own native son, Al Gore, in the last presidential race; some party leaders believe there may be little reason to think it will do otherwise, particularly if the nominee is a well-heeled senator from the Northeast.

`Massachusetts liberal' label

"There's no question that when certain issues are played up, Republicans will point to him being a Massachusetts liberal," said Alexander Lamis, who studies Southern politics at Case Western Reserve University in Cleveland. "But you have to confront those issues if you are to win elsewhere."

Mathematically speaking, the Democratic Party does not need to carry Tennessee or other Southern states to win the White House. But other Democrats argue that the lingering effects of a punishing economy accompanied by high job loss could trump the traditional cultural divide over abortion rights, gay rights and civil rights.

Kerry seized upon this earlier Monday as he delivered a speech outside a firehouse in Roanoke, Va., where he invoked a name that resonated well with the crowd of several hundred supporters.

"If you like what Bill Clinton gave you in those eight years," the senator said, "you're going to love what John Kerry gives you in the first four years."

Edwards, Clark fight for No. 2

As Kerry campaigned leisurely through Virginia and Tennessee, making only two public appearances during the day, Sen. John Edwards of North Carolina and retired Gen. Wesley Clark of Arkansas aggressively fought for what each campaign believed was second place. Each candidate is struggling to become the true alternative to Kerry as the race moves onto Wisconsin next week.

Though he has built his campaign around the practice of not attacking fellow Democrats by name--and usually not even by suggestion--Edwards has reminded Tennessee and Virginia audiences of his lineage in recent days.

"Folks in the South are tired of the Republicans taking the South for granted. They're tired of Democrats ignoring the South," Edwards said. "Let me say this in very simple terms: This is not about political strategy for me. I will fight for the folks I grew up with in the South."

Whether the strategy is effective remains to be seen. At a stop Monday in Morrison, Tenn., a hardscrabble town where the local Carrier air-conditioning plant recently received word it would be closing, Edwards commiserated with the soon-to-be-unemployed workers.

"These are good, responsible people who have worked hard all their lives," Edwards said of the folks at Prater's Bar-B-Que. "Many of them worked at this plant for 20, 25, 30 years. These are the people who make America great and, by the way, these are the people that are the reason I'm running for president of the United States."

While the factory workers appreciated Edwards' visit, greeting him warmly and thanking him for caring about their plight, it didn't mean they were sold on his candidacy. In fact, their union was leaning toward endorsing Kerry, and several workers said they planned to vote for the Massachusetts senator on Tuesday.

"I'm going with Kerry because I think he has the best chance of beating Bush," said James Mears, 49, who had worked at Carrier for more than three decades.

"But I'd like to see Edwards on the ticket as vice president," Mears added, unknowingly echoing the label that increasingly has been placed on Edwards, much to the annoyance of the senator and his staff.

chicagotribune.com



To: American Spirit who wrote (1372)2/10/2004 9:09:36 AM
From: JakeStrawRespond to of 81568
 
>>Kerry never worked with Fonda.

PROVE IT!



To: American Spirit who wrote (1372)2/10/2004 10:01:20 AM
From: JakeStrawRead Replies (1) | Respond to of 81568
 
Kerry lacks credibility in attack on Bush

Monday, February 9, 2004

CIA Director George Tenet said in a speech Thursday that his agency never contended that Saddam Hussein's weapons of mass destruction were an imminent threat, and Senator John Kerry then exploded as if he were himself a weapon of mass destruction.

"They (the Bush administration) said Iraq posed a 'mortal threat,' an 'urgent threat,' an 'immediate threat,' a 'serious threat,' and yes, an 'imminent threat' to the people of the United States," said the Democratic presidential candidate in what a news account describes as a prepared statement.

Given that Bush-is-a-liar outburst, it would seem time, for the sake of perspective and historical accuracy, to pull out a couple of quotes, the first from Kerry again, delivered in 2002 when he was explaining how he would vote on allowing military engagement with Iraq.

"I will be voting to give the president of the United States the authority to use force - if necessary - to disarm Saddam Hussein because I believe that a deadly arsenal of weapons of mass destruction in his hands is a real and grave threat to our security."

Now Kerry, it should be understood, had means of finding out about the assessment of U.S. intelligence agencies concerning the Iraqi threat. If he voted the way he did without some research, he was being irresponsible. His words about a "real and grave threat" are at least as pressing as Bush's oft-quoted words about "a grave and gathering threat." Both phrases, as it turns out, were right, but neither phrase should be mistaken by anyone whose literacy is not in question as implying that Saddam stood ready to give terrorists chemical, biological or nuclear weapons imminently.

That brings us to the second quote, this one from President Bush in his State of the Union speech at the beginning of last year.

"Some have said that we must not act until the threat (from Iraq) is imminent. Since when have terrorists and tyrants announced their intentions, politely putting us on notice before they strike? If the threat is permitted to fully and suddenly emerge, all actions, all words and all recriminations would come too late."

Here, just about as specifically as possible, Bush concedes the threat is not imminent. In fact, much of the debate preceding the war in Iraq was over the administration's intentions of going to war in the absence of an immediate threat, and it is impossible to think Kerry was so drowsy during all that discussion that he missed the point.

Tenet's Thursday remarks back up the administration - his assertion, for instance, that Bush never wanted anything but the unvarnished truth from him and his continued belief that Iraq posed a danger to this country.

The administration's credibility remains intact. Kerry's doesn't.

www2.thedailyitemoflynn.com



To: American Spirit who wrote (1372)2/10/2004 3:30:29 PM
From: Ann CorriganRead Replies (1) | Respond to of 81568
 
>>You may be the last Deanie helping Bush.<<

LOL
Where's my medal?

My primary reason for criticizing Bush was a mini-effort to get the "what about outsourced jobs?" discourse on front page of nation's newspapers. Today Hillary Clinton on senate floor held up LA Times & accused GW of promoting offshoring of American jobs.
Mission accomplished...finally.

Now both campaigns will highlight the real issues for voters instead of retro-Vietnam nonsense.