Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Don't Blame Me, I Voted For Kerry -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: stockman_scott who wrote (1376)	2/10/2004 11:52:14 AM
From: American Spirit	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 81568

If Kerry gets an Indiana, Arizona or Florida he doesn't need anything in the deep south so why waste his money there? Same logic that Bush won't try very hard in the northeast of west coast. If he were to pick a running mate from the south maybe he could grab one of them. Otherwise, I would see him going for Bill Richardson or Evan Bayh. Ohio is in play this year, as is West Virginia, most must-win states for Bush.

To: stockman_scott who wrote (1376)	2/10/2004 4:18:09 PM
From: ChinuSFO	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 81568

To think about Kerry's southern strategy is a bit premature. Al Gore is from the South and he lost in 2000. My sense is that after Kerry becomes the nominee, he is going to seek and get the active support of Bill Clinton. And that will be a big factor (positive) in the South. Kerry has already started to mention Clinton's name in Virginia etc. The Clinton economic team such as James Rubin, Robert Reich, Andrea Tyson etc. will swing into action and come up with a plan that the American people to hear about: the economy. That is going to be the cornerstone of the 2004 Presidential elections. And Kerry will ace it.