SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Microcap & Penny Stocks : Rat dog micro-cap picks... -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Chad Beemer who wrote (18083)2/10/2004 4:18:56 PM
From: Wowzer  Respond to of 48461
 
ROFLMAO oh I see, Bush's wreckless spending and bankrupting this country is all FDR fault!? Hey at least it ain't Clinton's fault anymore. Just curious is Bush responsible for anything or is he just a poor victim.....some leader....



To: Chad Beemer who wrote (18083)2/10/2004 4:33:59 PM
From: tsigprofit  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 48461
 
Oh those big bad liberals - it's all their fault - right!

Savage and others are spoon feeding you this crap. And it is pure BS. The world is not that simple my friend.

Is Clinton a big bad liberal? Damn right! But wait - didn't he inherit the Bush I deficit of $ 290 billion a year? Didn't he leave W with a big ole Texas sized surplus? Yup.

And W is a real conservative. A man of true moral values right? He won't let them liberals corrupt this country. No sir.

Oops! We took our 200 billion surplus, and now has created a $ 500 billion a year deficit (not including operations in Iraq and Afghanistan....) oops!

But at least he stands up to the big spenders in Congress!

Oops!

Repubs control all branches of the US government, and even dominate the state governorships now.

Oops!

And for the record - Reagan took over an inherited an approx. $ 50 billion deficit from "tax and spend" Carter. You know - the same weak liberal type...

Reagan increased spending on the military, cut taxes, and left Bush I with a $ 200 billion a year deficit as far out as the eye can see.....

Whoops!

>>
If you look at entitlement programs which began with FDR the liberals put us in this position. GW has too much of his dad in him in that he panders to what the liberals want. Reagan wouldn't do that as played the bully pulpit unlike GW who wants to try to work with everyone like he did in Texas.



To: Chad Beemer who wrote (18083)2/11/2004 1:39:55 AM
From: Buddy Smellgood  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 48461
 
Come off it. No one spent more than Reagan. He was making plans based on star charts for crying out loud.
Dubya work with everyone? We went to war because he couldn't work with anyone.