Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: JJL (Hijacked) who wrote (538413)	2/11/2004 12:12:57 PM
From: AK2004	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 769670

well, moron, either Iraq's WMD exist or not it really does not matter that much what matter is that Saddam failed to comply with UN resolution as per chief UN weapons inspector. Saddam not only failed to proof (and the burden of proof was on Saddam) but he also failed to provide very basic info such as the place of destruction of nerve agents. Even without CIA there were sufficient cause for the war. BTW only idiots like you do not believe that Saddam did not have WMD. When Saddam is telling you that he destroyed 1000s of canisters with nerve gas but no one in the country, including Saddam, can recall where and when it is almost a certainty that the weapons were not destroyed. In the 1st gulf war, where there were no invasion of Iraq Saddam sent his migs across the border for safekeeping so why would not he do the same with WMD with a threat of invasion? all in all there is only one conclusion, while it is unclear if Saddam had WMD it is very clear that you are an utter and complete moron