If, Mr. JP, you had included other races in your "negro" group , you might have a minor argument....but you don't…
This is lie #1 from J. Fraud. I include other races in the universe of “negros” in my very second post to the Fraud on this issue.
I do not care what you think, Shep. When you call decent men "house slaves," I am gonna think you are a Negro, with a miserable, whining life that is frozen in the 1950's. I will think this about you, whatever your color.
Message 19807388
(0 for 1, J. Fraud)
…the common denominator in your characterization is that all of the people in you special group are black
This is lie #2 from J. Fraud, since I obviously determine who is a “Negro” based upon behavior, and have flatly claimed that when a certain behavior is present, whatever one’s race, a “negro” is also present (see comments above).
(0 for 2, J. Fraud)
ergo you dislike an entire group of people for general behaviors you find repulsive.
This is lie #3 from J. Fraud. From the very beginning of this issue I was clear to make a distinction between morally bankrupt negros and blacks who are just regular Americans – as in my very first post on this issue:
When a morally bankrupt negro speaks, neither Powell nor any other black is insulted. Only the negro himself is insulted. Message 19806602
In my very first post to J. Fraud, I also demonstrated that I do not reject an “entire group,” but only the ignorantly behaving subset of the group. Check it out:
Indeed, "Negro." There is a clear and obvious distinction between the negros and regular Americans who are black. The negros whine and scream for handouts, claiming Bush has stolen their jobs and that he is racist and that he is like Hitler. They are still frozen in the 1950's -- still convinced that someone has to give them something.
Blacks like Powell and Rice and many businessmen and teachers, and neighborhood mailmen, etc. are altogether different. They are just these guys - American folk who do not have to berate other blacks with such names as "house slave" simply because those blacks exhibit such traits as courage and loyalty to their country. Yes. People who would denigrate blacks for these traits are not to be confused with being black at all. They are friggin' negros.
Message 19806871
So then it will not take a terribly perceptive individual to readily see that I detest the behavior of a subset of the group (along with that of their white kin) and not the “entire group” as J. Fraud has so fraudulently claimed.
(0 for 3, J. Fraud – ouch!)
That they are all black is indicated by your use of the term "negro" to identify them.
This is lie #4, since from my very second post to J. Fraud I was clear to demonstrate that the term “Negro” can in my opinion apply to people of all races. Check it out once again:
I do not care what you think, Shep. When you call decent men "house slaves," I am gonna think you are a Negro, with a miserable, whining life that is frozen in the 1950's. I will think this about you, whatever your color.
Message 19807388
(0 for 4, J. Fraud – oooh!)
Most people can find groups of people like that within all races. You make no effort, however, to explain that other groups of other races also may have those same characteristics....you stick your label exclusively on the blacks....
This is lie #5, since from my very second post to J. Fraud I was clear to demonstrate that the term “Negro” can in my opinion apply to people of all races. I certainly had ignorant insulting blacks in mind because at the time I though Dipy was an ignorant insulting black of the Negro sort. But as I made clear from the beginning of this issue, ANYONE can be a Negro. (Just take a look above)
(0 for 5, J. Fraud – dang!)
And if you said in one of your posts that some "negroes" can be white, it certainly doesn't stick out... At best there may be a weak and oblique reference in one note.....
Well, one note ought to have been enough, since the issue beginning this discussion did not particularly concern what race can make one a negro. It instead concerned what behavior can make one a Negro. And since I initially thought I was addressing a Negro of the black variety, I made it a point to deal with his brand of negroidism in particular. I certainly expected the response from leftists, which is why this last statement of yours can now be revealed as lie #6. You see I did not claim some negros can be white in just one note because I said negros can be of ANY race-- and I said it in no fewer than four notes, repeating, often even to you yourself, the claim I made in my earliest posts:
"As I have said in another post, 'negros' certainly can be white or of any other race. If one is stuck in the 1950's on this issue, then I am going to think one is an ignorant negro whatever one's race."
Message 19816443
"hahaha. Git him Srex! hahaha. I almost posted the post myself to prove that I included all races."
Message 19813357
"Such lies. What a fraud. I did no such thing. I described the term "Negro" and explained that it applies to anyone who would do what Dipy did, whatever their race..."
Message 19811235
"I do not care what you think, Shep. When you call decent men "house slaves," I am gonna think you are a Negro, with a miserable, whining life that is frozen in the 1950's. I will think this about you, whatever your color."
Message 19807388
(0 for six, J. Fraud. Six claims, six lies – just like a friggin’ leftist)
It must be miserable to be so danged pathetic and obviously incompetent. |
