Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: SilentZ who wrote (182999)	2/19/2004 12:32:38 PM
From: hmaly	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1575466

Zo Re.. stand by it. I did not say that it's going to happen, nor even that it was likely -- just that it wouldn't surprise me if it did. You do agree with him, when you say "It wouldn't surprise me", because with that answer, you agree there are great schisms in this country worth going to civil war over. If there are no worthwile schisms, then a civil war over nothing should certainly surprise us. So, what schisms are you and Ted talking about, which can't be solved through elections. When I asked Ted he posted this. Message 19821874 Had Bush been the great uniter that he insists he is, the current schism would be much less deep. However, he has made no effort to respond to the issues of the 48% of the population that did not vote for him. Now, from where I come, it's just plain stupid to ignore nearly half your population base but then, its clear Rep. don't think like I do. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thats a ridiculous, demeaning answer. So, I will ask you the same question. What great schism exists, that you wouldn't be surprised, if we would have a civil war over it.