SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Piffer Thread on Political Rantings and Ravings -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: MulhollandDrive who wrote (12810)2/26/2004 10:48:52 PM
From: mph  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 14610
 
thanks for the response.

I was trying to find a link
to paste...........

A quick google turns up too
many biased articles on both sides of
the issue.

I was just looking for the basic
explanation.

It's a 14th Amendment Equal Protection
issue in the last analysis..............



To: MulhollandDrive who wrote (12810)2/26/2004 11:06:41 PM
From: Jorj X Mckie  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 14610
 
Well, I can't dig into it now...I'm out the door. But it would seem that the doma laws are what would be in jeopardy and what would be reviewed by the supreme court as being unconstitutional.

makes sense that there would be an attempt to pass an amendment before the doma laws are put to the acid test by the supreme court.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News