Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: GST who wrote (125196)	2/27/2004 10:40:02 AM
From: Neocon	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

There is a good case for invading Pakistan, and we might have had the president not been so cooperative.........

To: GST who wrote (125196)	2/27/2004 12:06:33 PM
From: Nadine Carroll	Read Replies (4) \| Respond to of 281500

. No country did more to enable "rogue states" to develop nuclear weapons capability than did Pakistan So, what do you want us to do against Pakistan. Let me see - nothing. Ditto for Saudi Arabia, and North Korea. In fact, you do not think these are more pressing foreign affairs problems, because then you would want us to do something about them. They are just a bunch of excuses as to why we should do nothing. Nothing in Pakistan. Nothing in North Korea. Nothing in Saudi Arabia. And of course, nothing in Iraq. If we hadn't gone into Iraq, Libya wouldn't have flipped and AQ Khan's Sams Club for Nukes would still be in operation.