Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Neeka who wrote (32030)	2/27/2004 9:09:22 PM
From: E	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 793587

Here are the answers to your questions. Again. Q. how extensive were Mr. Kerry's wounds? A. Not extensive at all. In two cases, so unextensive that he didn't even have to take a day off. In one case, only two days of lost combat time were involved. The answer, therefore, is: Not extensive. Q: Do you know how extensive Mr. Kerry's wounds were, how they were treated and the time lost due to those injuries? A. What is going on with you? You posted the same question twice in the same post. The answer is, according to Mr. Kerry and the article I posted describing his heroic military service and bravery under fire, his wounds were slight enough so that only one of them required that he not go right back into battle. Extensiveness: Not extensive at all. Minor, as witness time: Time: 0 days, 0 days, 2 days. What's your problem? Oh yes, Q. "how were they treated?" A. Cleaned, antiseptic applied, then bandage of some sort. Just a guess. Leeches are out of fashion, as are herbs and roots. I suppose they could have called in an acupuncturist. No, I'll go with the antiseptic and a bandaid. You're humiliated at Bush's record of "service to his country." Kerry risked his life in service of extreme danger. What did Bush do? Tell me about it.