Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Just the Facts, Ma'am: A Compendium of Liberal Fiction -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: DavesM who wrote (4540)	3/3/2004 9:33:44 PM
From: mph	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 90947

AS didn't know that Warren Christopher was Secretary of State??? omigod...LOL

To: DavesM who wrote (4540)	3/3/2004 11:24:38 PM
From: American Spirit	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 90947

You're right Christopher was the first Secretary of State for Clinton. But he wasn't in office when any of that OBL stuff happened, was he? And Berger denies everything about the Sudanese rumor. read this. "The Sudanese never offered to give him to the United States," Berger insisted. "This is something I've gone back to check very carefully on. There's no - there's no - no one knows of any such offer." Berger suggested instead that the Sudanese had fabricated the story of bin Laden's possible extradition to the U.S. to stay on the Bush administration's good side after the 9/11 attacks. * This is what I'm talking about. Berger went on TV to deny there was ever such an offer. So either he's a bald-faced liar like Cheney, Rumsfeld, Bush and Rice on Saddam (possible) or he's telling the truth. Almost all the stories I found about the Sudanese rumor were on rightwing websites promoting the rumor as truth in an effort to slime Clinton and promote Bush. I tend not to believe any rightwing websites sinc they lie so often. Look at Drudge after all. Five big lies in a row about Kerry. None of it true at all. I'll believe it when the mainstream press corroborates it. BTW: I never said Clinton couldn't have been tougher on OBL. 300 cruise missiles were not enough. I'm sure Clinton regrets it himself. Even though Afhanistan is lanlocked and impossible to it by aircraft except over Pakistani air space, he should have done something. But 9-11 happened on Bush's watch, not clinton's, so Bush is responsible for 9-11. Bush was warned on 8-6 and did nothing. Bush never even mentioned terrorism until after 9-11. He was only obsessed about the useless SDI system.