Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: LindyBill who wrote (33165)	3/6/2004 10:01:32 AM
From: LindyBill	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 793664

Belmont Club - A Spectre is Haunting Europe Niall Ferguson at the American Enterprise Institute recently predicted a downward trajectory for the European Union. (Hat tip: reader K) He proceeds from the premise that the EU began as an attempt by the poorer continental countries to cut themselves in on the "German gravy train". The French jockey on the German horse. For a while this worked, but as more countries from Eastern and Southern Europe piled onto the horse and the German economy stalled the process reached its limit. The project outran its premise and now threatens to be more of a liability than a benefit. His second argument is largely anchored on demographics. Europe is dying. It's welfare state systems have created a class of pensioners and a system of entitlements which can only be supported by piling an intolerable burden on the dwindling numbers of working young. And when Ferguson says 'dwindling', he means just that. European populations are shrinking in absolute terms and aging in the bargain. To feed the welfare furnace Europe must turn to immigration. But since the only immigrants in hail are from the Muslim countries of the Near East, North Africa and Southwest Asia, Europe can save its welfare systems only at the price of hollowing out its culture. Ferguson notes how Gibbon speculated that absent the Islamic defeats of 732 a Muslim hegemony would have established itself all the way to British isles and wonders whether that event was not avoided but merely delayed. He concludes: I understand Samuel Huntington is worried that Mexican culture is taking a firm root in this country and shows no sign of being dissolved into the traditional American melting pot. I read an alarmist article by him in Foreign Policy this week. Well, I have good news for him. Long before the mariachis play in Harvard Yard, long before that, there will be minarets, as Gibbon foretold, in Oxford. Indeed, ladies and gentlemen, there already is one. The Center for Islamic Studies is currently building in my old university a new center for Islamic studies. I quote: "Along the lines of a traditional Oxford college around a central cloistered quadrangle, the building will feature a prayer hall with traditional dome and minaret tower." It will open next year. I wonder what Gibbon would have said. Gibbon might have asked where European culture was. He would have remembered the many instances in which nations although physically overpowered imposed their way of life on their would-be conquerors. The Greeks upon the Romans, the Chinese upon the Mongols, Islam upon the Turks and Hordes of Central Asia. Gibbon might have observed how the actual majority of persons in Saudi Arabia, that most Islamic of countries, are actually expatriates, many of them Christians, yet how these expatriates were unremittingly pressured to conform to the strictures of Islam. He might have asked why native Europeans, with every advantage of literacy over the immigrant droves cannot bring themselves to do the same. But would that would bring us to the other missing major figure in Ferguson's argument. European Marxism. The reality is--and it is perhaps the most striking cultural phenomenon of our times--that Western and Eastern Europe are no longer in any meaningful sense Christian societies. They are quite clearly post-Christian--indeed, in many respects, post-religious--societies. In the Netherlands, Britain, Germany, Sweden, and Denmark, less than 1 in 10 of the population attends church even once a month. A clear majority do not attend church at all. There are now more Muslims in Britain, indeed in England, than Anglican communicants. More Muslims attend mosque weekly than Anglicans attend church. In the recent Gallup Millennium Survey of Religious Attitudes conducted just a couple of years ago, more than half of all Scandinavians said that God did not matter to them at all. This, it seems to me, makes the claim to a fundamental Christian inheritance not only implausible but downright bogus in Europe. The reality is that Europeans inhabit a post-Christian society that is economically, demographically, but, in my view, above all culturally a decadent society. Here Ferguson skips directly over most of 20th century history. Between the era of Christendom and today's decadent Europe, we had the Continent Militant, the Church of the First, Second and Third Internationals. The correct metric is not Anglican Church attendance but membership in Greenpeace. And if only 1 in 10 Northern Europeans attend church how many are religiously devoted to the precepts of the United Nations? The two phenomenon are related. The absence of a dynamic European identity is deeply connected to the soft Marxist orthodoxy that mandates its demise and regards all its manifestations as shameful. Europe is the grasp of a cultural suicide pact inked in 1848 and it will not survive until it rescinds it. If America remains itself while Europe fades away, it may be in part due to the absence of a Western Hemisphere Islamic hinterland ready to overrun the Southern US border, but it will owe more to the fact that America escaped the sorcerer's spell which has locked Europe in irons. But perhaps people have already made their choice. America is, after all, populated largely by those who rejected the gulags, worker's parties, street rallies and manifestations of collective strength just as Europe is peopled by those who decided to remain in spite of them. Yet Europe is not doomed -- not yet -- if in the words of their own sorcerer "they openly declare that their ends" -- the preservation of their heritage and culture, are nonnegotiable. They must choose between Marx and survival. What should they fear, if sharia is the alternative? The Europeans have nothing to lose but their chains. posted by wretchard

To: LindyBill who wrote (33165)	3/6/2004 10:10:25 AM
From: Rambi	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 793664

If I owned an SUV, after reading this, I would sell it immediately out of embarrassment. :) internal industry market research concluded that S.U.V.s tend to be bought by people who are insecure, vain, self-centered, and self-absorbed, who are frequently nervous about their marriages, and who lack confidence in their driving skills We are not prestige car people, though. My requirement is that it runs when I turn the key, is new enough that I can blame the dealer when something goes wrong, and has a good radio/CD player. You know, we have friends who just bought a big SUV because their accountant told them they could save a lot of money in taxes if he used it for work (he is a realtor)and it met the size requirement. I hope COngress closes this loophole. I feel sure that the deduction was meant for small business owners who really need a small truck or van -- plumber, electrician-- not the urban realtor in his very expensive SUV.

To: LindyBill who wrote (33165)	3/6/2004 11:04:30 AM
From: Lane3	Respond to of 793664

Another example of the public's incompetence when it comes to assessing risk. Maybe we could get the author to do a piece on terrorism... <g>

To: LindyBill who wrote (33165)	3/6/2004 6:07:36 PM
From: carranza2	Respond to of 793664

Many modern SUVs are nothing like their predecessors. The hybrid SUVs are quite safe. Many have a unibody construction, not the bolt-on-a-frame build criticized by the author of the article, all-wheel drive, ABS brakes, and sophisticated traction control systems that transmit power to each of the four wheels so as to prevent slippage and loss of control in wet or icy pavement. There are now multiple airbags and crumple zones. High centers of gravity, a valid concern in previous SUVs, are a thing of the past. Many are quite sporty and very responsive to good drivers. The industry is learning--the wave of the future is for all SUVs to have the kind of features I've described. I think that the huge SUVs--Suburbans, Yukons, Navigators, and the like, are not going to be with us in their present form within the next half decade for economic reasons. They are simply too expensive to operate and oil prices will in all likelihood be going quite a bit higher. Who want to spend $75 or more filling up a tank of a vehicle that gets 10-12 mpg? We had a nice run of cheap oil, a factor that helped the sales of big SUVs tremendously, but I don't think the prospects for cheap oil in the long term are very good. And what was the key element of safety when you were a child? It was that your mother fed you, and there was warm liquid. That's why cupholders are absolutely crucial for safety. If there is a car that has no cupholder, it is not safe. If I can put my coffee there, if I can have my food, if everything is round, if it's soft, and if I'm high, then I feel safe." The author may be onto something. My experience is that children are more interested in cupholders than any other group of passengers.