Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Moderate Forum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: rrufff who wrote (7688)	3/8/2004 2:43:23 PM
From: The Philosopher	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 20773

Agreed. I would get behind any candidate who showed me integrity, character, quality of thought, ability to inspire, and awareness of learning from history. I could add in a few more, but those will do. Oh. And when they say "read my lips" they had better mean it! Adlai Stevenson had all those except the ability to inspire. Very bright, damn fine man, nobody cared. Clinton had none except the ability to inspire. No integrity, no character (at least no good character), but for some reason he got people believing in him. Put together Stevenson's mind and philosophy with Clinton's charisma, and you've got somebody I could really support. Bush ain't it. Kerry ain't it. Nadar ain't it. Sigh.