Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: TimF who wrote (184497)	3/10/2004 8:59:27 PM
From: Road Walker	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1573689

Mr. Literal, re: No Bush did not say that. He might have said that there are such weapons (certainly members of his administration did) but he never said that the Iraqi weapons where going to be used to blow up American cities in the next few months. He didn't even say what many accuse him of, that an attack with these weapons was imminent. He sure as hell implied it. John

To: TimF who wrote (184497)	3/11/2004 1:01:54 AM
From: tejek	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 1573689

Bush said, in effect, there absolutly - positively - as God is my witness ARE WEAPONS in Iraq and he is going to use them to blow up american cities within the next few months. No Bush did not say that. He might have said that there are such weapons (certainly members of his administration did) but he never said that the Iraqi weapons where going to be used to blow up American cities in the next few months. He didn't even say what many accuse him of, that an attack with these weapons was imminent. Maybe Bush didn't but Cheney sure as hell did: "On Aug. 26, 2002, Vice President Cheney told the VFW, “Stated simply, there is no doubt that Saddam Hussein has weapons of mass destruction. There is no doubt he is amassing them to use against our friends, against our allies and against us.”" amconmag.com Doesn't Cheney speak for the Bush administration? ted